The Trump Administration has been very clear on their policy with
respect to Venezuela. They supported regime change for months on end,
and when opposition leader Juan Guaido claimed to be interim president,
they loudly endorsed him, and accused everyone who didn’t endorse him of
being in league with the Maduro government.
Experts, however, are warning that this is a risky strategy,
and one that is not in keeping with traditional US government tactics.
They say in particular that it is unlikely for Maduro to leave
peacefully, and if he is removed, it would be by Venezuelans.
In backing regime change, the US both loses its ties to the de facto
Venezuelan government, and risks embarrassment if the opposition doesn’t
ultimately take over the country. It leaves the US in an inflexible
position, with few options.
CFR Senior Fellow Shannon O’Neil called it a “huge break from
precedent,” noting that the US continued to recognize the Soviet Union
for over 50 years despite being hostile to them. He says the hope is to
rally support to regime change, but failing that, it will leave the US
“stuck in this limbo with fewer alternatives than if you held your cards
a little bit closer.”
Experts Warn Ousting Maduro Without Violence Is Unlikely
Recognizing Guaido is risky, limits options
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×