On Wednesday, a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers in both the House and Senate announced their intention to reintroduce the War Powers Act challenge to the US participation in the Saudi-led war in Yemen. The war was never authorized by Congress, and the challenge would require the administration to end US involvement.
The Yemen War was initially launched by the Saudis to oust a Shi’ite faction and reinstall former President Hadi, who in a US and UN-backed “vote,” won an election with no opposition in early 2012 to a two-year term as president. The term has long since expired, though the Saudis maintain he is the only legitimate ruler for Yemen.
After years of trying to reinstall him, soaring civilian death tolls and an estimated 14 million people facing starvation, many lawmakers are reluctant to keep the US seal of approval on this war. In December, the Senate passed a War Powers Act challenge against the war, but the then-leadership of the House prevented a vote on the matter, forcing them to start over with the new Congress.
That’s exactly what Congress intends to do now, with a new Democratic leadership in the House willing to allow a vote, and the Senate just having to run through the same process it did last month. This could be the first serious legal challenge to the Yemen War.
President Trump has threatened to veto any bill calling for an end to the war, but growing war weariness and anger at the Saudis over the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi have bolstered the bills, meaning a veto override is at least plausible.
Indeed, this would be one of the easiest sorts of bills to make a case for overriding a presidential veto, as the War Powers Act is explicitly about Congress blocking presidents from launching unauthorized wars. For a president to turn around and veto a bill in which Congress is pointing out he is engaged in an unauthorized war is not in keeping with the Constitution’s intentions of Congress having control over wars.
Though the War Powers Act intends to give any individual lawmaker power to bring such a challenge to a vote, the House had been using back-door rule changes to prevent such votes from taking place. With that no longer a factor, a vote seems assured.
Maximizing support for the votes is still important, however, particularly if there is to be a veto override. While there is not a timetable for the votes as of yet, those wishing to call their legislators should do so. House member’s contact information can be found here. The House version of the bill is HJ Res 37. The Senate version is SJ Res 7, and your Senators can be reached by calling the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121.
I do not get this hope that politicians will “do the right thing”! Why are they all dancing in the streets foir Venezuela intervention?
Let’svget this clear — all we need to do is raise the. Naval blickade of Hodeidah. Complicated?
So, why are we “involved”, by brutal blockade and “supporting” Saudi Arabia wagjng war on Yemen? Why is Saudi Arabia interested do much in getting control of the port, and having Sana’a capitulate? After all, the entire North Yemen is Shia, and has been so for more then thousand years. Why are we not talking of Aden or Southern provinces?
It is because we are in conflict with Saudi Arabia over Yemen. We are not assisting them, we are helping ourselves to the spoils of war. In this case, Bab al Mandeb is the prize. UAE controls Aden, and secessionists control South.
And for now, this can be kept in limbo, until Sana’s is brought to the table. BUT. There is a big but. US wants control of Hodeidah, even by means of inserting UN, but Sana’a will have to acquiesce. Saudis do not want that. They want exclusive deal with Sana’a, and control of port. And will keep the war going for as long as necessary. UN is now distributing food snd medicine, but this is not the end game. If Saudis prevail, a huge problem for UAE. US and UAE played a separate game in Aden pushing forces of ex-president Hadi out of the city. South inconclusive, as two former sultanates — Al-Mahra and Hadhramouth are in secessionist camp, and UAE is not in control. From neighboring Oman, UK base is playing separate game, trying to get the two sultanates to go back to be British protectorates. The bottom: if Saudis settle with Sana’a — UAE must support Saudis and US may lose out on all fronts. Arabian side of Bab al Mandeb would remain independent of US. Keep in mind this is the reason for Egypt and Sudan bejng Saudis coalition partners. They do not trust that US would not resort to blocking. shipping to/from Asia to any of the three Red Sea countries. Saudis are particularly sensitive, as Persian Gulf is not exactly stable.
So what s Congress going to do here? Pull US Navy from Yemeni coast and lift blockade? Or just theatrically talk of “refueling”, as if Saudis are in need of such services! Or are we closer to letting go of the entire Yemen project — as we are about to lose one and only ally in this mess — UAE. Outcome of Kashoggi case is the consolidation of power in Saudi Arabia, and major clean up in intelligence, defence, foreign affairs. Which country did MbS visit first after taking care of internal purge? UAE. I am concluding that UAE is no longer hedging its bets, and has to grovel quite a bit to repair relations with Saudis.
So, end game still not clear. Unless Congress knows something more. As a rule, they are not that informed, nor do they care about such things. They usually know what they want. Let us see what comes out this time around.
They find a way to do in secret.
And here I thought it was just my TDS that wouldn’t allow me to think Trump was a peace president.
I’ll give trump credit for being open about where he is on the vote.
I wonder if Justin Raimondo reads his own site. He is celebrating Trump as a “Harbinger of a New Age” of peace while Trump is threatening to veto legislation to end US support for the Saudi-UAE war in Yemen. Justin’s New Age is an age where he expects his readers to ignore starving Yemeni children and butchered Saudi Journalists.
When will Justin find the cojones to join Tulsi Gabbard who accused Trump of being Saudi Arabia’s bitch?
Like this one where he throws a pissy fit because the intel services don’t agree with him on Iran.
https://news.antiwar.com/2019/01/30/trump-slams-intel-chiefs-who-contradicted-him-at-senate-hearing/
So congress wants to end this war where we have minimal involvement, but votes to keep the wars where we are directly involved going. WTF?