When the program for modernizing America’s vast nuclear arsenal started
being discussed, proponents in both parties argued that the high cost
was acceptable, and that there was no cost too high for new nukes.
But they’ve been spending years testing this theory, with ever-mounting
estimates for how much the program would ultimately cost. They may
finally have hit that cost limit Thursday, when the Congressional Budget Office upped the cost another 23%, to $494 billion.
It no longer seems everyone is on board with that. Rep. Adam Smith
(D-WA), the new House Armed Services Committee Chairman, says the
modernization plan is just flat out “unaffordable.”
Smith warned that it was time to stop blindly following that path
without asking bigger questions about the cost of maintaining a credible
deterrent. Smith’s predecessor as committee chair, Rep. Mac Thornberry
(R-TX) shrugged off the price increase, saying he was sure people would
discuss it, but saying it was a fairly small percentage of America’s
vast military expenditures.
US Lawmakers Balk at Soaring Cost of Nuclear Arms Modernization
CBO estimates scheme will cost $494 billion
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×