Having spent decades advocating a US attack on Iran, John Bolton’s
position as National Security Adviser is allowing him to push the idea
hard with President Trump. For those less enamored of that war,
including Pentagon leadership, there is mounting concern that Bolton might provoke such a war.
So when Bolton came to the Pentagon asking them for military options for attacking Iran, nominally in retaliation for a Shi’ite Iraqi militia firing mortar shells in Baghdad, they were reticent.
The options they delivered were reportedly very limited. They involved
little more than a show of force with limited airstrikes against some
random Iranian military site. This was far short of what Bolton wanted,
but former Defense Secretary James Mattis argued that even this was a
bad idea, and no attack has happened yet.
But the National Security Council are still saying the attack plans are
being considered, and Mattis is no longer around to argue against it.
This potentially would allow Bolton to push for the symbolic attack and
hope it escalates into more, or to push the Mattis-less Pentagon for
even bigger plans for more ambitious wars.
Pentagon Officials Fear Bolton’s Actions Could Provoke War With Iran
Long-time hawk is pushing Pentagon for military options in attacking Iran
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×