In an interview with the Washington Post, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan said they he wants a “proper relationship” with the United States, and that Pakistan will no longer be treated like “a hired gun” who fights someone else’s war.
Khan said in his view, the US has been pushing Pakistan away throughout the Afghan War. He also rejected the interviewer’s suggestion that he is “anti-American” because of his positions, and denied that Pakistan is supporting the Taliban.
That seemed to be a sticking point throughout the interview, as Khan reiterated that Pakistan is not setting up “sanctuaries” for the Taliban nor directly aiding them, but was repeatedly pushed by the Washington Post to “cut it out.”
The Washington Post further declared him “very anti-US” because of his opposition to US drone strikes in Pakistan. Khan said this is an imperialistic approach that “you’re either with me or against me.”
Would America be “anti-Pakistan” is they were doing drone attacks in the US and we opposed them? We are disgusting.
WoW….. Imran is the man. His own man and Pakistan”s too.. Why did U.S. invade Afghanistan… Because Bin Laden was hiding there after he was booted from Africa. But why not do a joint effort with Afghanistan…??? Why does this all drag on after Osama is long gone? Caspian Basin oil & gas is the answer… Big oil and gas want to get their share is why. Afghanistan is the killer of Empires… Get out before you die….. While you still can…. And NOT from the embassy roof…!!!!!!!’
It amazes me that the prime minister of the country is saying that Pakistan was treated like a hired gun. Isn’t it insulting to the Pakistani armed forces? Were Pakistan military paid to fight American war in Afghanistan? It is true that Pakistan gave land and air access to American forces but that is not what the term “hired gun” means.
“He also rejected the interviewer’s suggestion that… Pakistan is supporting the Taliban.”
Nov. 2008:
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/12/world/asia/12pstan.html
June 2010:
https://www.rferl.org/a/NATO_Goods_For_Afghanistan_Attacked_In_Pakistan/2065923.html
Sept. 2010:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/30/AR2010093000491.html
Oct. 2010:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/22-more-nato-trucks-torched-in-pakistan/
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130430854
Dec. 2010:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/3682067/Taliban-raids-Nato-convoys-for-second-night.html
July 2012:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-18975754
June 2013:
https://tribune.com.pk/story/561316/three-killed-in-attack-on-nato-containers/
Not to mention the fact that Pakistan hid and protected Osama Bin Laden for years.