Congress commissioned a report from the National Defense Strategy Commission on Pentagon readiness. It is relatively predictable what these reports would boil down to, because they always come down to the same conclusion.
Despite vastly outspending every other country in the world on the military, the report concludes that US military superiority “has eroded to a dangerous degree,” and is facing a “crisis.” The solution they counsel is, as ever, a massive increase in military spending.
The report uses the typical scare-mongering to try to justify an increase in expenditures, claiming that the US “might struggle to win, or perhaps lose, a war against China or Russia,” and that the US might be “overwhelmed” in the even of two or more war fronts simultaneously.
This echoes, if perhaps in even more dire terms, past reports that also claimed the constant fighting of several wars is eroding readiness, and that the US needs to spend even more money. The problem is, the increased spending has kept being approved, and every time, it leads to a new round of reports warning that they need all the more money.
The US is always spending many-fold more money than anyone else, and fighting more wars than anyone else. Yet despite nations like Russia increasingly limiting their military goals, the reports are forever claiming Russia is seriously a threat to carry out attacks on the US home-front. Such claims are preposterous, but have reliably worked in getting more money.
The really interesting thing about this is that this National Defense Strategy Commission is a product of the United States Institute for “Peace.” Can Ministries of Love and Truth be far behind?
The NDSC’s report is available for PDF download at: https://www.usip.org/publications/2018/11/providing-common-defense .
Bring along a barf bag.
Spending money and threatening anyone possible with sanctions while ignoring or flouting international laws seem to be the “strategy” of the USA to rule the earth. This ruins the lives of millions, destroys the environment for all and ensures the USA is always on one side and only toadies join it.
Maybe we should stop challenging Russia and China in THEIR spheres of influence.
Peace isn’t profitable. No way the arms merchants and the bankers are going to allow their puppets in government to promote anything but profitable war.
Let’s merge with Russia and form an expanded Republic. What’s the big deal? Tired of all the nonsense.
We are an EMPIRE, no longer a Republic. But I would be happy to merge with Russia if we could bring back the republic. They seem to have more freedoms than we do nowadays.
As long as we never audit military spending as Congress mandated to reduce corruption (just not “realistic” they say), and continue to act unilaterally and aggressively all over the world, sure even the gigantic military budget won’t be enough to take on the world and always win. They didn’t have to commission a study to figure that one out.
Military spending should’ve been audited from the get-go and Congress should’ve cut off the funding if corruption wasn’t reduced and the US continued to act unilaterally/aggressively worldwide. Congress abdicated that responsibility years ago; that’s why the gigantic military budget won’t be sufficient to take on the world and win. As you rightly said, they didn’t have to commission a study to figure that one out .. Another waste of money.
Still waiting for Rumsfeld’s audit of the missing trillions from the Pentagon budget……
The US has no problem starting wars it can’t win against third world countries, which hardly admits the US to the big league Russia and China are in.
The US Army is composed mostly (70%) of overweight soldiers underqualified in electronic warfare, the Navy has undependable and vulnerable surface ships especially obsolete aircraft carriers (given missile technology), and the Air Force is currently burdened with unreliable aircraft including a couple hundred expensive F-35 “fighters” (not) which are parked in training squadrons.
China and Russia have superior people and more qualified military gear. Just look at Syria, where US and coalition forces had no choice but to carefully avoid Russian airspace for fear of losing an aircraft. The US “might” lose a war with military superpowers who don’t herd goats but have hypersonic missiles? Of course it would lose.
The US has no problem starting wars it can’t win against third world countries, which hardly admits the US to the big league Russia and China are in.
The US Army is composed mostly (70%) of overweight soldiers underqualified in electronic warfare, the Navy has undependable and vulnerable surface ships especially obsolete aircraft carriers (given missile technology), and the Air Force is currently burdened with unreliable aircraft including a couple hundred expensive F-35 “fighters” (not) which are parked in training squadrons.
China and Russia have superior people and more qualified military gear. Just look at Syria, where US and coalition forces had no choice but to carefully avoid Russian airspace for fear of losing an aircraft. The US “might” lose a war with military superpowers who don’t herd goats but have hypersonic missiles? Of course it would lose.
America is spending money on more of the same I.e. quantity! More bombs, cruise missiles Humvees, vehicles etc etc) while Russia is spending on quality, ie more refined high tech completely new generation state of the art supersonic weaponry. (Which is cheaper and based on research). That’s what Putin announced earlier this year. He said (quote) “Now they will be talking to us”. There are many experts in the field who believe Russia will win a war, which does not mean that America has still the ability to inflict serious damage and lead us to a Apocalypse.