Analysts and defense officials past and present are warning that a potential military exchange with North Korea is unlikely to be a brief, token show of force or a simple trade of fire, and rather would almost certainly quickly escalate into a full-scale war, including potential use of nuclear weapons.
For decades, North Korea’s massive conventional arsenal of artillery and rockets have led to estimates that over a million people could be killed in a new Korean War, and that much of the South Korean capital of Seoul would be leveled in the attacks.
New estimates that North Korea likely has a deliverable nuclear warhead threatens to raise the war to even more catastrophic proportions, as well the US brags of having a superior arsenal, even a small nuclear exchange would have disastrous consequences.
As we look at the possible consequences, former senior military officials talked openly of how the war would likely begin: with a preemptive US strike involving B-1B heavy bombers attacking North Korea from an Air Force base in Guam.
That’s another potentially big problem, however, as many recent US “show of force” actions have involved flying B-1B bombers over the Korean Peninsula. Given this new assessment, it’s even more likely such actions will be misinterpreted by North Korea as a real attack, and have them scrambling to retaliate.
This is potentially even more worrying than the possibility of the US knowingly launching a preemptive strike, despite the growing threats that they might do that. Increasing tension on both sides could readily lead to a miscalculation, and a war accidentally resulting.
If a preemptive strike is nuclear, there is no way to forecast with certainty what the immediate psychological & morale effects would be on the North Korean military. Could be that Pentagon hawks gamble it will lead to short term shock & confusion leading units to ponder weather they should retaliate or desert.
Presumably NK generals understand there would be only a brief time window for meaningful retaliation, and presumably commanders have been assured that they will be executed if their units fail to get of any shots in response to an attack but there’s no way to predict the reactions if things really got that far.
ANY MILITARY STRIKE ON NK WILL CERTAINLY RESULT IN A NUCLEAR RESPONSE.
I would feel more comfortable with Trump making big threats if he had a record of standing up to China. How many empty threats can he make? Forget about NK ICBMS, if there is war, NK will send nuclear bombs to Japan on fishing boats; they won’t be able to stop all of them & who knows the harm that will come from a very irradiated Sea of Japan, assuming it stops there…
This is not 1951, and he’s not talking about nukes.
Trump advisor Sebastian Gorka said:
[there are abilities the US has] which are “not
discussed on television” that can “incapacitate a regime’s capacity to use its
military” the comment is around 1:50-2:00
Right, we’re going to send Rambo in to neutralize the entire military apparatus of North Korea. And all because this guy told us so. I’m sold.
I guess you’ve never heard of EM, plasma, or scalar.
Your man Gorka didn’t mention any of those. Only how foolish anyone would be to mess with the big, bad USA and how it would be suicidal for any to try. How would they be suicidal if we can neutralize their military and avoid mass casualties? And why the f**k don’t we just do it if there will be minimal casualties?
You’re talking out of your ass.
Just stop digging, already. lol
Oliver North said the same thing tonight on Judge Janine. Secret weapons are going to be used if this happens. I’m not advocating for a pre-emptive. My opinion is that Kim is an idiot.
I suppose the Korean War of the 1950s was just like that to you too.
CHINA AND VIETNAM VS. USA; CHINA AND NORTH KOREA VS. USA. CHINA WILL NOT SIT THIS ONE OUT.
Trump’s abysmal ignorance about nukes despite his 71 years on this earth is matched by the belligerent,unfair, over the top production by 535 alleged US “lawmakers” of an attempt to put the blame for the USA’s appalling behavior for decades onto Russia, Iran, DPRK, Syria, Palestine-anyone but the real perpetrators of conflict.
I didn’t realize that there was a UN Security Council resolution allowing military action against North Korea…or have I missed something?
anything else, like this militaristic talk of pre-emptive strikes, would be an overt act of aggression and surely result in the death of hundreds of thousands or perhaps millions.
If you actually believe that Pyongyang has “deliverable nuclear warheads” than I have some Nigerian Yellow Cake to sell you, fresh out the oven.
Maybe by deliverable, they mean put the thing on a fishing trawler and sail it to some US port city and blow the place up?