In comments that are not likely to sit well with either the Syrian government nor their allies, US coalition spokesman Col. Ryan Dillon today insisted that the US “absolutely have no problem” with Syria, or any of its allies, advancing into the remaining ISIS strongholds to try to defeat them.
Col. Dillon insisted that a concerted effort to move against ISIS “is not a bad sign,” though this claim likely sounds particularly galling after the last several weeks, in which the US has repeatedly launched airstrikes against pro-Syrian forces that have gotten even close to ISIS-held territory in Raqqa and Deir Ezzor Provinces.
The US has previously presented attacks on these forces as “self-defense,” because they argued the pro-government forces are too close to a US-backed rebel base at al-Tanf, and even shot down a Syrian plane in “collective self-defense” when it bombed an ISIS-held town that was being advanced on by Kurdish forces.
The US attacks were particularly controversial because the US war in Syria is supposed to exclusively be about fighting ISIS, and recent attacks have had nothing to do with that mission, instead targeting Shi’ite militia forces out in the middle of the desert to keep them getting too close to an area that is still overwhelmingly ISIS-held. Pentagon officials have struggled with whether this amounts to a shift in focus of the war or not, and reports have suggested those struggles are even more intense behind the scenes. Either way, “welcoming” Syria to try to take back parts of Syria held by ISIS is insincere so long as US forces are going to attack them for doing so.
Gee, thanks Col. Dillon. Thank you so much for giving a sovereign country the right to conduct the business of protecting its territory. If only it were true.
There is a disagreement between US and Assad . Assad wants to stop the civil war that has been raging in Syria against him and his government for 5 or 6 years .. The rebel forces are AlQaida , Al Nusra and ISIS . The United States has been helping the terrorists . Our no 1 goal is to get rid of Assad , If we do that Syria will most likely be ruled by AL Nusra , Al Qaeda or ISIS . All three of these are terrorist organizations that will definitely start beheading the Syrian minorities . Most Iraq’s minorities would have gladly stayed in Iraq if we could have kept our nose out of Iraq . And I believe Libya would have been much better off without our help too It would be nice if the United States could just leave other countries alone and mind our own business for a while