When Congress approved $500 million to train a brand new force of “pro-US” Syrian rebels, they were promised the moon, with the Pentagon eyeing 3,000 fighters by year’s end and a path toward tens of thousands of loyal, heavily armed fighters.
The program was abandoned outright last month, with only 190 rebels ever trained, and only about half of them ever getting as far as Syria. Despite this, the Pentagon still managed to blow through most of the budget, capping out at $384 million, over $2 million per trainee.
The Pentagon insists that the training itself actually only cost $30,000 per trainee, but they blew through the rest of the money on weapons, vehicles, and ammunition. Of course, much of this wound up being immediately surrendered to al-Qaeda when the second class of trainees arrived in the country.
The first class of US trainees numbered 54, and were famously routed down to “four or five left.” The second class was between 70 and 75, though how many of them remained active after giving their arms to al-Qaeda was never clear.
2 million per person. That could pay for some education, health care, housing for, you know, Americans.
If I want to buy a .22, then I have to fill out forms, submit to invasive checks and investigations, racial profiling, etc…
If I want TOW II missiles, Abrams tanks, MANPADS, Humvees, MG's, RPG's, grenades, and training on how to use them; well all I have to do is say, "Ooh look at me, I'm a moderate Syrian Rebel" and the stuff just falls from the sky…
November 6th, 2015 U.S. Prepares War Against Russia in Syrian Battlefield
On Tuesday November 3rd, U.S. Defense Department spokesperson Laura Seal told The Daily Beast that twelve F-15C air-to-air combat planes are being sent to the Incirlik Turkey Air Base for deployment in Syria against Russia’s Su-30 air-to-air combat planes. Neither the F-15C nor the Su-30 can destroy ground-targets, only air-targets — enemy planes.
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/20…
So they spent 494,000,000 on weapons and equipment that was immediately given to al-Qaeda ?
I suppose Mr Ditz's purpose to to argue against the US training any more anti-Assad rebels, but all that would do is bog Putin even more since he would then have to fight the unwinnable war against ISIS all alone. This is the problem for Putin and his American backers: even if he "wins", he loses!
Why are you so obsessed with Putin and Russia that you post comments about them even when the article a has nothing to do with Putin and Russia?