Turkish officials today say that they have “concrete evidence” that the weekend bombing against a peace rally in the capital city of Ankara was carried out by attackers linked to ISIS, and were from the same faction involved in the July bombing in Surac.
The Surac bombing killed 31 people, and targeted a group organizing aid for the Syrian Kurdish city of Kobani. The Saturday strike targeted a peace rally organized by the pro-Kurdish HDP party, and killed at least 128 people.
Thousands of mourners took to the streets of Ankara after the Saturday bombings, and HDP officials accused the Turkish government of being involved, saying they have been targeted in the past in the lead-up to national elections.
Turkish officials are denying that, and also denying accusations of insufficient security at the Ankara rally, saying they had some 2,000 personnel deployed at the protest to try to prevent attacks. They failed, but they insist they made a serious effort.
The Erdogan regime is as criminal as his NATO supporters are when it comes to have connections, supporting and supplying Isis in last four year Syrian war. Now they are trying to wash their bloody hands by reporting that evidence shows that Isis is to blame, the question is, who supported Isis, who financed them and who asked turkey Erdogan regimes to be the logistical supporter of Isis.
The Syrian government said it four years ago, one day they will turn their weapons that you supply to them for fighting Syrian people against you. That day is here and the barbarians have shown their intention.
Well, let's review some information on ISIS and Turkey. ISIS sells stolen Syrian oil to Turkey (which Turkey gladly purchases knowing that it is supporting terrorists), ISIS depends on an open channel through Turkey for its weapons and recruites, ISIS is supported by Saudi Arabia and you can bet Turkey is getting big bucks for facilitating the free flow of arms and jihadists. Erdogan recently tried to boost his up coming election results by bombed the Kurds using the excuse that he was bombing ISIS.
The bombing may well have been done by ISIS but the real question is, To whom is ISIS obligated and who will benefit from the killing of peaceful pro-Kurdish demonstrators?
so then russia is the "bad guy" for destroying these pigs?? the u.s. is so f'ed up it's beyond the pale.
No, Putin (not Russia) is the bad guy because he invaded Ukraine, the first European leader to invade another sovereign European state since Hitler. I suspect that Putin wanted to "help" the US to fight ISIS in the hope of being rewarded by being allowed to keep his ill-gotten gains in Ukraine. By the way, what makes you think that Putin will "destroy" ISIS? And even if he wins, all he'll have is a vassal stste with a puppet president and will be bogged down for the next 20 years trying to prop Assad up.
just stop with your claptrap which has ZERO basis in reality…if putin "invaded" the ukraine, the ukraine would be flying the russian flag in 24 hours. nuland and the usa funded the take over of the ukraine but i don't know why i even bother to mention this to your insipid brainwashed mind.
Plausible theory. Perhaps ISIS is hoping to get Turkey to concentrate on the Kurds and leave them alone.