Last week, the European Leadership Network (ELN) published a report claiming that NATO and Russia are both making active preparations for full-scale war, citing massive military exercises on the border, and US war-gaming on “sustained” wars in Eastern Europe.
NATO is officially “denying” this, but the rest of their statement reads less like a denial than like an attempt to shift the blame to Russia, insisting all their preparations are response to “Russian aggression,” and that the exercises actually “enhance security in response to growing Russian aggression.”
The ELN report urged both sides to scale back their operations before the situation got out of hand, another idea NATO is rejecting, as they insist that the huge training exercises are “proportionate” and in line with international obligations.
NATO went on to say it is “unfair” to compare their military exercises on the Russian border to Russian exercises on the NATO border, because they’re both really quite different in some obvious, but totally unspecified, way.
What? NATO denies its own existence?
When nato does it, it's great. When Russia does it, it's evil. 2500 years of civilization and that's where our leaders have taken us.
You need to spend more time reading American internet sites! There, when Putin does it, it's great but when NATO does it, it's evil. And the only thing more evil than NATO is the EU! The message is always the same. The only difference betwen the sites is the jargon in which they dress the message up.
Include some links, I'd be happy to spend more time reading those sites.
After the collapse of the USSR in 1989 NATO became obsolete. The Warsaw Pact was disbanded. NATO promised at the time that it would not move (quote) "one inch eastward". NATO reneged on its promise when in 2002 it began deploying an anti missile defence system in Poland, ostensibly aimed at Iran?
In February 2014 US engineered a coup d'état in Ukraine and installed a fascist Neo Nazi regime in Kiev. Eastern Russian speaking Ukranians revolted against the new Nazi regime and Crimeans in a popular referendum elected to go back to join Russia. One and a half million of Eastern Ukrainians fled the war and sought refuge in a Russia, the supposed enemy. NATO holds military exercises right at the border of Russia. How provocative is that. Russia of course is bound to react to such provocations and is holding military exercises within its own territory. Who is the aggressor here?
This is the classic "punish the victim" argument. Ukrainians' rights were violated by Victoria Nuland. That gives Putin the right to … viloate Ukrainians' rights!!! The agressor is the country which invaded another sovereign state's territory and annexed part of it, namely Putin's Russia (not to be confused with the Russia of ordinary, decent Russians, who have no say in anything!).
So the country that brings about the toppling of another country's president is what according to you?
Please, provide proof of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the neocons in DC would be very thankful for it.
Pyatt-Nuland installed a thuggish regime that is murdering those in the east in deems "Russians." Crimea got out in time, but what about the Donbass people whose cities are shelled daily by the regime?
And "invaded another sovereign state's territory"? Please. If Russia had invaded, those Kievan mortar positions targeting civilians in Donetsk and Lugansk would have been destroyed in seconds by a couple of Su-25s.
It depends who you ask the question, if you ask NATO they will say that they are God sent angel with machine guns protecting European people, but if you ask Angela Markell, or that Swedish king, they definitely would say: we are at peace with the world, the proof of our statement is in our relationship with Israel and Netanyahu, our other proof is that: we spend and give so much to him that can build new houses in occupied Palestinians territory for the American Jewish immigrants.
The classic propaganda war, although it's interesting that Russia is not denying the claim that it is preparing for war. Granted that Putin has invaded and annexed teritory belonging to another sovereign state has, at very least, threatened to make war on that state if it uses force to put down an unlawful rebellion in its own sovereigh territory, violating the Helsinki Final Act on both counts, has sent biker gangs to unlawfully enter Polish and German territory and has threatened the US with a nuclear attack, it's hardly surprising that NATO is preparing for the worst case scenario.
It's not possible for Putin to "violate the Helsinki Act," since it has no binding provisions on any party, nor, even if it did, are his government or the Kiev regime signatory to it.
When the West tore Yugoslavia to pieces it violated the Helsinki Final Act.
NATO — Satan’s most valuable disciples
A power combine the most deadly on earth, this is NATO and it has held this supremacy since the rise and fall of the Roman Empire. This is the Western world, a for whites only invading and plundering world destined to reach the ultimate conclusion of all evil.