One week into the Saudi War in Yemen, the conflict is already looking much more difficult than officials had initially portrayed it, with heavy airstrikes nationwide doing little to prevent the Shi’ite Houthis, their primary targets, form gaining territory, including the key southern port of Aden.
That’s only one aspect of the setbacks the war is facing, with al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), seemingly forgotten in the precipitous rush to intervention, suddenly taking a major city for itself, and freeing hundreds of prisoners.
So far, the airstrikes have only managed to kill large numbers of people, including hundreds of civilian bystanders, and are fueling a major backlash among the Yemeni public against the war, including among officials who’d initially endorsed it.
A war initially presented as a cakewalk which would be resolved in a matter of weeks has already been openly extended to several months, and the reality of the situation is that even with a planned ground invasion, there is little reason to believe the Saudis have a concrete exit strategy.
I'm not sure I follow this one- the Houthis (Shi'a?) are getting their act together to kick the Yemen branch of Al-Qaeda (Sunni) out, but in doing so Saudi Arabia has attacked the Houthis claiming they are being backed by Iran- and the US is jumping on the anti-Houthi bandwagon as well, even though they are fighting our alleged arch-enemy in Al-Qaeda?
Meanwhile elsewhere we're actively supporting Iranian-backed Shi'a forces in their fight against the IS (Sunni).
Can somebody confirm this, or at least unravel what appears to be a case of the US backing both sides in this disaster?
Well, Caesar, the term "byzantine" has its origin in the ridiculous level of complexity involved in middle eastern power politics. I'd say it is most appropriate as a descriptor here.
The policy is extremely consistent and goal oriented. Zbigniew Brzezinski invented the term "arc of crisis," more recently referred to as the "arc of instability," in 1979 to describe the intended results of "the Bernard Lewis Plan" to "encourage nationalistic upheavals among minorities, such as the Lebanese Maronites, the Kurds, the Armenians, Druze, Baluchis, Azerbaijani Turks, Syrian Alawites, the Copts of Ethiopia, Sudanese mystical sects, Arabian tribes and so on." The Anglo-American MIC has done everything in its power in the subsequent 36 years to create Maximum chaos in the region.
The stated goal of the policy was divide and conquer. However, I believe the real institutional imperatives have always been to justify increased military spending, sell more arms worldwide, enhance the careers of military brass and other National Security State employees, generate Congressional pork and strike fear in the public to distract them from their increasing misery at the hands of corporate elites.
http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/arc-crisis#.V…
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2846b_lewis…