New NATO chief Jens Stollenberg insisted today on a mission to Poland that he doesn’t believe Cold War agreements on troop limitations in Eastern Europe apply any longer.
Stollenberg insisted that NATO can put troops wherever it wants and no treaties would be used to limit its decisions on deployments, which hyping a planned “spearhead” force to be deployed along the Russian frontier.
He talked up the idea of sending more troops to Poland above and beyond the planned spearhead force, though he spurned pushes for permanent bases in the Baltic states, citing the enormous cost of such operations.
The cost of such operations is largely the appeal for the US and other top NATO spenders, which are pushing all NATO member nations to dramatically icnrease their military spending.
Islamization in Middle East, militarization of Europe is the Neo philosophy of peace and wars written by USG and directed by NATO. Looking for Third World War, is coming at you in near feature. What you see in Ukraine and in middle east is the preview of what is coming.
Devastation in the middle East not Islamization.
Talking almost conciliatory with Russia while simultaneously beefing up their attack forces in Russia´s vicinity, is it a kind of mental disorder that the post as a NATO kriegs-fuherer require?. The former war criminal the same as the new one, no surprises there and Stoltenberg will too, just like Foggy Ratmussen, become drenched in blood and a subject for a war crimes tribunal.
That is the danger today.NATO and USa remeber about treaties only when it is good for them.
And I bet people thought that with the departure of Rasmussen that the warmongering would be tempered…
And btw, his name is Stoltenberg.
Isn't this the same fellow that the pro-Putin faction was hyping as more or less "anti-American"?
The Daily Beast
fascist nato, what can one expect, the new nazis
So, the only treaty obligations which need to be respected are those demanded of Russia. Unreal.
Reasonable people believe in reciprocity. If NATO can place its troops wherever it wishes, then Russia should have the same right. Perhaps Moscow should place its troops in Brussels.
So that same argument can relate to the Russians they can put their forces where ever they like, the cold war agreements don't count anymore! Nuclear missiles back on Cuba, remembering that they were only put there because the US put Nuclear missiles on the Turkish USSR border!
Of course then the same fool Stollenberg would say that that was in fact threatening behavior!
Do these fools realize that Russia still can make slag heaps of US cities, or are they that foolish that they believe in acceptable losses, sadly I suspect it is the latter, he should be fine he will be in a bunker somewhere when the missiles start to fly!
Try putting nato troops in russia bub.ji