As Israeli airstrikes escalate, Hamas is firing rockets deeper into Israel than ever before, firing not only at Tel Aviv and western Jerusalem, but at distant Haifa as well.
Hamas is making much of these strikes as proof of their resolve, though their ramshackle unguided missiles did virtually no damage in Israel, and caused no reported injuries.
This has been the case in past Hamas rocket attacks, and while they spun the 2012 Israeli attacks as a “victory,” their own missile fire did comparatively little, and the real victory was getting a ceasefire in short order.
In 2012, Hamas was ill-prepared for a ground invasion, and that’s even more true today, as the group has lost most of its foreign connections, which makes the rocket fire riskier than ever.
During the 2008 invasion, Hamas had ties to Qatar, Syria, Iran, and Egypt’s Mubarak government, and there was a lot of momentum for a ceasefire in the waning days of that war, and a lot of criticism of Israel’s harsh attacks.
Even in 2012, though Hamas had lost most of its Syria and Iran ties with the Syrian Civil War, the Morsi government of Egypt was even closer to them, and was eager to negotiate a ceasefire on their behalf.
With the Egypt coup, Hamas has lost virtually all ties to Egypt, and the Sisi government, while giving some hint they might be willing to broker a ceasefire, has been openly hostile to Hamas, and their only interest is to prevent spillover of fighting or refugees into the Sinai Peninsula.
Hamas, in short, needs an out, and while they are playing at the usual game of rocket fire hoping for a similar result to 2012, there is a great risk that Israel’s far-right coalition government will listen to its more hawkish members and continue to escalate, with calls for a ceasefire coming only from less directly involved powers like the European Union.
Ultimately these wars are forced upon Hamas and the Palestinians. Its an annual operation to degrade Hamas' capabilities referred to by the Israelis as "mowing the lawn". Hamas is defending itself as best as it can. However, the missiles are a form of defiance that drives the Israelis mad. Although they do very little damage, if they stopped Jews would feel better about their subjugation of the Palestinians. In addition, the Palestinians continually improve their capabilities even though it takes years. Just the fact that they were able to infiltrate Israeli shores in this last round demoralizes the militarily "superior" enemy. In that context Hamas is winning. Furthermore, in the long run, unless they can eradicate Hamas, Palestinian resistance will defeat the Zionist project.
Jason, look for a rerun of the 2008 attack, with one particular element to consider: Mubarak claimed that in 2008 Israel asked him to simply open the border and allow all of the Gazans to flee into Egypt. If we see a renewed attack that same demand might be made again, and Sisi might not be in a position to simply say "are you insane?" as Mubarak apparently did. Because the Israelis do have an answer to those foreigners who ask what they think will eventually happen if they continue to build settlements and oppress Gaza.
The answer: transfer.
What does Hamas and the Palestinian people got to lose under Zionist occupation and America`s backing just more of it with no end in sight.We all know the Zionist do not want peace just all of Palestine.
What would Hamas have to gain by the death of three Israeli teens?
Hamas knew it would be isolated if it provoked a skirmish with the
rogue state. It's former allies Syria and Egypt are mired in their
own civil conflicts, while Iran is busy propping up the Maliki regime.
The rogue state was well aware of Hamas' dilemma. Bibi, and his illegal
state knew for weeks that the three teens were dead, and spent the time
leading up to current hostilities spreading his racist rhetoric. The
goal was to scuttle a Palestinian unity government.
There is little Hamas can do with its bottle rockets against the rogue
state's arsenal of US made military hardware.
Perhaps O-boom-er, the former (Nobel Peace Prize) laureate, could step
in on the behalf of Hamas to prevent further bloodshed?
Just a thought.
Wondering why the Saudi's aren't helping their brothers in Palestine but they sure will cause violent jihad in their other muslim countries?
Hamas is a resistance group, and is allowed no weapons, no army, no legitimacy when elected, no chance to show if they are genuinely ready for nonviolent negotiations. The whole of Gaza, and any Hamas member in the WB, is pummeled mercilessly at any time. When a few rockets are fired after constant provocation by Israel, this is considered "terror".