The Karzai government has repeatedly taken the US military to task for killing large numbers of civilians in the occupation, but they may just be the tip of the iceberg, as Afghan officials say a case is being made suggesting the US has also engaged in “insurgent-style” attacks which were blamed on the Taliban.
The officials didn’t discuss the evidence in much detail, but the belief is that many of the attacks were timed to undermine the Karzai government, or in some cases to immediately follow up civilian deaths with a story to distract attention.
There is a fairly substantial list of “suspected” incidents, and incredibly enough it even includes the recent attack on a Kabul restaurant in the diplomatic district, though officials conceded there was no concrete evidence of that one yet, and its inclusion is based on timing.
US officials reacted to the report with anger, saying it “flies in the face of logic and morality,” though they have often reacted similarly to reports of civilian deaths in air strikes and night raids that are eventually proven.
I suspect that this has been happening in Iraq also. After the intoxication of 'victory' wore off they realized that Iran was the indirect beneficiary of their invasion and so they started secretly to work against the Shi-ite govt. in Iraq. Just speculation on my part.
In Iraq, two SAS (British) troops were discovered dressed as Arabs, and were carrying a large quantity of explosives in their car. They were jailed by Iraqi police, but British tanks broke them out of jail and the MSM dropped the story. Information on Gladio is readily available, as is information on Operation Northwoods. The use of false flag attacks is ancient. It would be extremely naive to think they aren't used in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Lebanon, the US, and anywhere else the global "elite" thinks they might be useful to further their indescribably evil plans.
Even if we give the USA the benefit of the doubt, which would be ludicrous to do, and say it definitely wasn't behind these attacks, the kind of which it has carried out innumerable times on record, we still know the USA is a huge supporter of Saudi Arabia, which in 2009 The Obama white house said, leaked by Wiki leaks, is the world's biggest importer of Sunni terrorist groups and the Taliban…
And that's not to mention that the USA helped bring the Taliban to power and, until September, 2001, was working on an oil pipeline deal with them and trying to get them to expand to cover all of Afghanistan.
Details and sources: http://empireslayer.blogspot.com/2014/01/what-usa…
Ignoring the 'morality' bit, it'd be perfectly logical that the USg would do such things. And it'd be a stretch to claim it just never did. One precedent might be the Color Coded Terror Alerts that appeared timed to favor Bush. Not to mention the immediate drop of 'ism' in GWoT rhetoric: to call it a 'War on Terror' is an excellent signal that someone would like to suck you dry by sicking you on anything they can make sound scary. It's about as subtle as a War on Angst…in which they'd sick you on anyone who made you feel socially inadequate… Back to the 'morality' bit: no, there is no such institutional ethic –there's nothing there for it to fly-in-the-face of.
As has so-often been said, "When war comes, truth is the first casualty."
Senator Hiram Johnson.
Please, all of you, research Operation Gladio. The US has done false flags all over Europe which killed many people since the 1950s. Unless Gladio is understood the "war on terror" cannot be understood. Sibel Edmonds at Boilingfrogs, and James Corbett at the Corbett Report have done great work on this.
If these reports are even marginally true, it hopefully will be enough to push the American people over the edge to end this age of foreign adventurism. The fact that there are so many things that could be done here in the US with the money being wasted over there is more evident now and I believe the American people are looking for an excuse to end it all. Too bad the pols haven't caught up with the citizens yet. Maybe if we "retired" a bunch of the worst this next election cycle the message from the people to the Archons might get their attention.
The sad and pathetic thing is that probably few people would be surprised if this were true. How low can the US go to foster violence, death, and destruction the world over?
Well ya can't sit down for farting on these people. That's all they want to do anyway, sit around and fart. No msttyer how much you do for them, no matter how much it costs, they're never happy and they're never grateful. And they go bugdirt when you kill anybody! Geez!
Easy way to test this theory…
Pull all US/NATO troops out and see if the attacks continue. I'd guess that they would.