This week’s military coup in Egypt ended the Muslim Brotherhood’s brief rule as a democratically elected government, and post-coup crackdowns against the group have suggested that if another election is held, they won’t be welcome to run.
It’s being taken as a lesson in democracy for groups in the region, especially Islamic groups. The lesson is that democracy simply isn’t going to work for them.
Every call for an opposition faction to try to implement change in a country through political means must always be considered in the context of whether or not that country’s military will allow it. In a region awash with militaries with a long history of cracking down on Islamist factions, the answer is simply no.
In the near term this may be welcomed by some, as abandoning the Egypt model will likely take momentum away from Islamist political movements region-wide, especially in nations with a history of coups.
In the long run, however, barring a popular ideology from political participation must inevitably set the stage for more violent transfers of power, as the failure of democracy to facilitate a peaceful transition of power will encourage such factions to re-visit violence as a means of facilitating change.
They objected to an attack on Syria
So do I , Russia , India and China . come to think of it I objected to the attackt on Yugoslavia and Libya too . It seems to me the western powers believe they should be the only ones attackting anyone .
You might want to pin this article on Obama's forehead there is no such thing as democracy in the middle east, just ask Saudi Arabia.
Actually, this is the epitome of democracy; rather than anti-democracy as the author claims. The populous of many nations around the world could take a clue from Egyptians.
President Obama is supporting/not supporting any pro and con military fluid situation kinetic ready to invade and provide no-fly zone for friends and enemies democracy al qaeda yes/no secular religious moderate extremist what the US stands for is military non military for us or against us. Does he make himself clear?
I think it's rather a lesson on how easily a democracy can be corrupted, how competing agendas can lead to violence and strife. It's also a lesson of the value of the Iron Fist. Saddam may have been a dictator, but I would wager most Iraqis look to the Saddam era with some nostalgia. While I supported Obama in his policy of nurturing the Arab Spring, I think it has it's problems. Perhaps it is better not to rock the boat.
Anyone seeking to impose sharia law on others NEEDS to be met with deadly military force of the lethal variety.
I'm inclined to agree in principle. There seems a tyranny by a minority. The immense number of objectors to policies of Morsi and the Brotherhood speaks impressively. That number in opposition didn't exist at the outset of the elected term.
Kill the Egypt Army!
Even those small Bastards which are just enforcing orders!
Their leaders are on the payroll of CIA and Mossad!!
Only that will help to establish Democracy in your country!!
W9