The UN General Assembly has passed a non-binding resolution calling for the ouster of Syrian President Bashar Assad and backing the rebellion against him. The vote was opposed by Russia as well as a number of nations expressing concern about foreign intervention in Syria’s ongoing civil war.
Russia was particularly vocal in criticizing the timing of the resolution, coming just after a US-Russian agreement to work toward a negotiated settlement, and expressing concern that the resolution would damage the efforts to start new peace talks.
But perhaps the big news is not that the resolution passed, rather it is that the resolution passed with a fairly narrow majority, only 107 votes out of 193 nations, compared to 133 in a similar vote last year.
The loss of votes in favor of regime change likely reflects a growing concern about the behavior of Syria’s rebels, from attacks on civilians and al-Qaeda ties to a particularly shocking video earlier this week showing a rebel eating a soldier’s heart. While Assad has never had a lot of allies, there seems to be a lot of fear that post-Assad Syria is going to be a big problem for the region.
I am sure that the tyrants of Middle East and their barbarians cheering the idea.., I am sure that Wahhabis, the salafis and other affiliated terrorist groups from Europe to Saudi Arabia celebrating the vote.., yet it has to be said that such vote won't bring peace to the Syrian people, nor any part of this world where USA and EU is at war with.., it won't keep theses terrorists stop killing Syrian people, it won't stop falsified democracy to accomplish another illegitimate and falsified government that its want to replace with what Syrian people have voted for.., such assembly with such votes is another definition of business as usual by the west and for the west to continue their support for apartheid, dictatorial and tyrant regimes.
What I want to know is.., when this assembly or any other at the UN is going to vote ordering Interpol to arrest George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, for war crime in Iraq, Bill Clinton for war crime in Yugoslavia, Hillary Clinton and Obama for deceptions and lying about Libya and now syria.
UN has really outlived its purpose. Getting involved in regime changes? And nobody cares about Syrians. Once the west has established a narrative "Assad is killing his own people" , everything else has become irrelevant. But given what we know now, it is clear that if anyone has been killing people — the honors goes to the "rebels". They have shown the capacity for cruelty bar none in recent history. They do nothing but terrorize people. And UN cares about what will happen to the region, but not what will happen to Syrians should the government fall, and the LUNATICS get hold of the society. How come that nobody ever claimed before the "rebellion" that Assad was a "brutal dictator". All we know is that Syria was a civilized country, with women going to Universities, having careers, deciding for themselves what to wear or whom to marry. Assad still has support of the vast majority of population (most women, businesses, students, wealthy and educated Sunni, all Alawites, all Christians. Other then the uneducated Sunni Salafists, who is supporting the "revolution"?
This is incredible – UN GA voting on something which is the cornerstone of UN itself – national sovereignty thus eroding one important cornerstone of its base. I see this as a total corruption and total win of NWO. How is this possible? Well, I think whole thing was planned all along when this latest world economic crises and depression started. It is probably clear to anybody that nations scrambling for survival will do almost anything for some crumbs from the tables of the rich. This is a big corruption. There was also probably some small corruption involved – offering leaders or diplomats of poor nations some benefits for their vote. Who was a godfather of this resolution? That is what would be interesting to find in this article. Unfortunately it is not there.
One more question: how come UN GA did not vote on Iran sanctions – they are basically acts of war on Iran. Are all members happy with open economic warfare on one of its members for just paranoid assumptions of waring states?
What worth is there left or credibility for that matter for this organisation where it can pass such a resolution against a member state? It is time to realise that this organisation simply serves the interests of certain privileged groups. It is time for the "small guys" to leave and form a body that does what the UN is supposed to do. and to do it fairly and impartially. The UN would be a joke if the consequences of its subservience to its masters were not so tragic.
Why bother believing in the hoax of unity or common sense when it comes to the UN? All those diplomats want to be important in someone's eyes and it is obvious that they are all in awe of the fierce gaze of the US. Would any of them sanction the same treatment of their country? They are bunch of spineless, self-righteous wannabes.
influence of empire
vote or no aid
vote or no trade
vote or no debt relief
vote or no mil deals
vote or you're next
Lets look at the interests in this game. Could it be that the gulf states have a plan to avoid Arab spring. Sucker their Islamic radical population into Syria and get the US to run a turkey shoot. Bonus, Gulf states reduce Shia influence get pipeline. Israel reduces Hezbollah influence and gains an Americanist corrupt regime to the east and oil fields and captures a bunch of weapons. Americans get a corrupt regime that will spend every dime it has on weapons to protect itself from it own people.
UN General Assembly Vote Reflects Shift in Syrian Public Opinion
http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?ei…
Russia created great strategy- stretch the time and all will turn against criminals.
Syria’s permanent Envoy to the UN Bashar al-Jaafari said his country regretted the adoption of a biased and unbalanced UN resolution, thanking the countries that rejected the resolution “for their responsible positions which support the UN principles and the international law articles”. He noted that the decrease in the number of countries that voted in favor and the increase of numbers of those who abstained from voting indicates the growing international understanding of the reality of what is happening in Syria due to the foreign interference, support of terrorism, the spread of extremism and incitement besides the refusal of dialogue. “We rely on the UN and its member states to support Syria and its people against the culture of extremism and terrorism, and to encourage the comprehensive national dialogue to peacefully resolve the Syrian crisis.” he said. In a statement released after the vote on the UN draft resolution on Syria, al-Jaafari He said that the French delegation had foiled the issuance of a number of UN press releases to condemn the terrorist acts committed by al-Qaeda-linked armed groups in Syria which claimed the lives of thousands of Syrians as it foiled a UN release to condemn the attempt of assassination of the Syrian Premier.
After Qatar’s ambassador spoke in favor of the resolution his country drafted (and re-drafted several time), Ja’afari revealed that there existed an e-mail, from the representative of the Syrian opposition given to Syria’s embassy in Qatar, showing Qatar’s involvement in the kidnapping of UN peacekeepers by the Yarmouk Martyrs Brigade. He read out a phone number from the e-mail as several Gulf diplomats grimaced or scowled, and three left the Chamber.
Visibly stunned, the UK Permanent Representative Lyall Grant called the whole matter “deeply confusing”. Another Permanent Representative, from a militia contributing country, said that if true, it’s “very problematic.” The reasons include the fact that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon had just thanked Qatar for its roles in the release of the UN Peacekeepers the earlier kidnapping of whom the Qatari government may have planned, paid for and executed.
Meanwhile, Ban Ki-moon’s spokesperson Martin Nesirky said he would not disclose any more about the “negotiations to free the peacekeepers or who was behind the crime.”
All those nasty family businesses from Gulf, Britain and USA-39 US presidents are from one family, backed resolution as they stand behind criminals as they did from French revolution thru WW1, Bolshevik revolution, WW2 and so on.
For the first time in a long while I tend to agree with Russia on this! I don't support foreign powers to get involved in such conflicts!