In Senate testimony on Tuesday, the US’s most senior intelligence officials reiterated their conclusion that Iran has not decided to develop nuclear weapons and that its strategy is essentially defensive in nature.
“We do not know if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the Senate Intelligence Committee.
However, Clapper explained, the intelligence community’s assessment is that “Iran is developing nuclear capabilities to enhance its security, prestige, and regional influence and give it the ability to develop nuclear weapons, should a decision be made to do so.”
This analysis conforms to the long held conclusion that Iran’s goal is to bring itself within the range of nuclear weapons capability, in order to signal to its adversaries that it could develop nuclear weapons rather quickly if it ever decided to do so. Essentially, the strategy is meant to serve as a deterrent without having to violate Iran’s treaty obligations prohibiting proliferation.
“Iran prefers to avoid direct confrontation with the United States because regime preservation is its top priority,” Clapper said.
“Technical advancements” in Iran’s nuclear capacity “strengthens our assessment that Iran has the scientific, technical, and industrial capacity to eventually produce nuclear weapons,” Clapper explained, making “the central issue its political will to do so.”
Iran has repeatedly addressed the issue of its political will to build nuclear weapons – specifically, that it does not exist. The Islamic government of Iran has decreed in a religious fatwa that such indiscriminate weapons are a sin and forbidden by Islam.
And again, on Tuesday, Iranian news agencies quoted Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi as saying, “Iran plans to declare in the United Nations that it will never go after nuclear bombs.”
Despite progress in their nuclear capabilities, Clapper said, “we assess Iran could not divert safeguarded material and produce a weapon-worth of WGU [weapons grade uranium] before this activity is discovered.”
Again describing Iran’s posture as defensive in nature, Clapper added that Tehran views its conventional missile capabilities as “an integral part of its strategy to deter – and if necessary retaliate against – forces in the region, including US forces.”
3 thoughts on “Intel Chief: Iran Cannot Secretly Divert Nuclear Material for a Bomb”
Sounds a bit like a policy of nuclear ambiguity. Where have I heard that before?
What a bas-ack-wards world we live in, where to our ignoble shame we Empire builders get to make villains out of our victims, and notwithstanding every politician under the sun and worldwide knowing for a reality that within the criminal intent of our voting majority,
“Every inclination of the thoughts
of men is only evil all the time.”
This doesn't "confirm" anything. There is ZERO evidence that Iran wants EVEN a "break out" capability.
Iran knows full well – and has said so – that there is ZERO use case for an Iranian nuclear weapons program. There is no one threatening them with nukes that they have the capability of deterring even if they HAD nukes. They certainly could not deter either Israel or the US from conventional war, and neither country will ever do a nuclear first strike due to the geopolitical repercussions.
The ONLY country Iran was EVER worried about was Iraq under Saddam. And that country is unlikely to ever be returned to Sunni control and again become a threat to Iran.
What is happening in talks like Clapper's is a projection, a speculation, that Iran needs, wants or could use any sort of "break out" capability. There is zero logic behind that concept.
Comments are closed.