Despite NATO repeatedly and loudly condemning Syria for shells straying into Turkish territory, and threatening to defend Turkey militarily from its smaller, war-torn neighbor, there’s no good evidence who was shooting those shells in the first place.
That’s the report from US Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling, who in an interview today said that “we are not sure if these shells are from the Syrian army, from rebels who want to get Turkey involved in the issue or from the PKK.”
Any of those is possible, as many of the rebels are openly backed by Turkey and would love nothing more than to see Turkey, and by extension NATO, invading to install them as the new regime. The PKK, of course, is eager to attack Turkey any chance they get, and are increasingly involved in Syria’s war.
Not that any of this was considered when NATO was railing against Syria for shells hitting Akackale, insisting at the time that it was the government’s fault and discussing possible retaliation even as Turkey was launching air strikes.
I have expressed some doubts about who was responsible for cross-border shelling of Turkey from Syria's "liberated" northern territories after the first shell landed on Turkey soil. It is obvious that Syrian army would think twice before doing so – they are too busy to fight NATO's proxy fighters on their own territory. Syrian "rebels" have been calling for international military invasion and help in their fight against Assad for close to a year now with no success. It would be just logical thing for them to provide NATO with reason to move finally. .
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. And it mirrored Bibi's bluster. We damn well need to tell them to prove a case or shut up –put the burden on those who'd 'escalate.' All of it.