After a solid 30 years of fearmongering centered around Iran’s civilian nuclear program, and the nuclear weapon that is always just “months” away but never seems to actually get made, “experts” are being quoted in the media with a bunch of new scenarios for things Iran might conceivably do.
The first is really just an extension of the existing nuclear hysteria; the electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack. Popular in cold war fiction, the EMP rests on the idea of not attacking a city with a nuclear weapon, but instead detonating it in the air so that the resulting electromagnetic field disrupts electrical systems, potentially knocking out electricity in the effected area. Such an attack rests on the idea of Iran getting a nuclear weapon first, however, and therefore is no more likely to happen than all of the other nuclear-based hysteria.
The second plan, which officials claim they have evidence is being considered, is called “Dirty Water.” It is precisely that, the idea that Iran might up and spill a bunch of oil into a Straits of Hormuz, causing an environmental disaster on their own shores to force a massive international cleanup, which would require Iranian help and therefore force the UN to “relax” sanctions to allow such a cleanup. Though Iran could theoretically do this since it has a bunch of oil already sitting on ships, it isn’t clear why it would be considered, as it solves none of the ongoing tensions in the region, and seems more the sort of thing a James Bond supervillain or Lex Luthor would do than a country under sanctions.
Finally, and perhaps most plausibly, we have “cyberattack.” Politicians like to say cyberattack on TV because it makes them sound techno-savvy, and adding “cyber” to the beginning of words or phrases is always a good bet, with US politicians ever on the lookout for “cyber 9/11.”
The Pentagon is also pretty sure Iran is to blame for cyberattacks that have already happened. Not that they have any proof, but it makes sense in their own worldview of the Internet as a “battlefield of the 21st century,” and doubly so since the US has been openly launching cyberattacks against Iran for years. It would make sense that they might retaliate, but so far Iran is denying this, and there is no evidence to the contrary.
The biggest argument against Iran being responsible is that many of the sites have been incredibly small and irrelevant, and it isn’t clear why Iran would bother to make Bank of America’s website a bit slow for a few hours. It certainly isn’t anywhere near the scale of US and Israeli cyberattacks on Iran, in which virii not only damaged a number of Iranian centrifuges, but escaped the country and did billions of dollars in economic damage worldwide as well.
Iran the boogeyman. Thank goodness for the distraction of Iran or we might be forced to look into cleaning up our own house.
9/11! Iraq! 9/11! Ir.. okay Iran again!
> adding “cyber” to the beginning of words or phrases is always a good bet
To anyone actually in the industry, adding “cyber” to the beginning of words or phrases makes one sound like a juvenile retard.
> and spill a bunch of oil into a Straits of Hormuz
"Reporting" made up from oil spill stock footage on CNN during Gulf War 1 comes to mind…
> EMP
Today in times of Israel:
“Some are skeptical that Iran would use a nuclear bomb just for an EMP attack,” said Landau. “If they already have a nuclear weapon, why not use it for the main purpose for which it was designed? But while a nuclear bomb targeting an Israeli city would cause mass destruction on a local or regional basis, an EMP attack could cause even more lasting damage, destroying Israel’s electrical grid.”
Tel Aviv And Sourroundings is worth less than the electrical grid. Maybe it's used as a phone to God?
Very interesting that, with regard to the most destructive cyberattack attributed to Iran (against Saudi Aramco) the Saudis themselves said they had traced the attack to Eastern Europe, specifically Romania.
And don't forget that most terrible of Iranian secret weapons- the huge schools of trained sharks with lasers on their heads.
The west doesn't know what lies to concoct to convince the world about the inherent evilness of the Iranians. But the world knows about these scare tactics. Moreover we know about the inherent evilness of the west and their lackeys wherever they are.
Dont forget the "Iranian female ninja assassins" story. With lasers on their heads? And the "wipe off Irsrael" lie. Someone should keep a running tally.