May of 2011 was a month spent primarily trying to get straight the killing of Osama bin Laden, with the Obama Administration repeatedly changing its official story, starting with a “highly volatile firefight” and changing to killing bin Laden in the kitchen.
The new Navy SEAL book, which looks to be the final word on the matter, insomuch as it is the only firsthand account Americans are likely ever to see, suggests that not only were the early versions of the administration’s story nonsense, even their later, toned down ones were, and they never told the truth.
In this version, troops were headed upstairs and opened fire at a random person who stuck his head out of the door to see what the ruckus was. Finding him on the floor badly wounded, potentially dying, the troops fired several more rounds into his chest until he stopped moving. Then they interrogated a little girl to find out that the person they had just executed was bin Laden.
This opens up a whole can of worms, as nominally the troops were supposed to try to capture bin Laden for all the valuable intelligence he might conceivably have. But when the troops were executing him they didn’t know it was bin Laden to begin with, and made no attempt to find out, so if the intelligence on the house, which officials concede was a bit shaky, had turned out to be false, they had just murdered some random guy in a Pakistani house.
That is of course just the first step in a long trail of intrigue on the bin Laden raid and the Obama Administration’s deliberate and repeated deception related to it. Having killed instead of captured bin Laden, the Obama Administration claims they stuck him in a bag and hurled him into the sea somewhere. That too appears to be false, as Stratfor claimed knowledge (in leaked emails) of his body having been brought back to the US and to Dover Air Force Base, the same base which was embroiled in a scandal about mishandling corpses, including dumping slain US soldiers and unidentified 9/11 victims into a landfill as “medical waste.”
The truth is they murdered some random guy in a Pakistani house,
Bin Laden died in December of 2001 of pulmonary complications bought on by kidney disease according to the Egyptian paper AL-WAFD, the story was also carried by FOX about the same time.
exceelent shoot first ask questions later good to see the night raids techinique they learnt in afghanistan is still doing wonders for the US military.
Do our politicans ever stop with the lies?
So, are you a politician then?
Well I wouil take you for a liar. You believe everything this news agency reports.
Roger 166p • 8 hours ago
And a reliable source named Al Jazeera says otherwise.
So, why not make a list of the news sources not iranian friendly enough for me to use then?
says the paid hack
No, you weren't the one saying it.
And you are the self admitted paid hack.
6 minutes ago @ Breitbart.com – Protests to greet Ahma… · 1 reply · 0 points
I'm like jesus, I'm gonna chase you money changers out of the temple and out of town and of course out of this forum. Me and ohsoquiet and a few other REAL AMERICANS who are being PAID to be here like you Israeli PR men. I'm here to chase you filth out.
What is the different between "not Iranian friendly" and "unfriendly to Iran"? Brainfart wants to know.
Cindi Sheeehan said it best: "Anyone who believes any part of the official Bin Laden story is an idiot."
Is HITLER still hiding in Canada??????????if so then OBL did die in million Dough-lerrrrr mension in Pakistan.
Well, duh! And that's only the half of it. The guy has been reported dead since as far back as 2001.
So I wonder if sarah palin, or michelle bachman, will still masturbate over seal team 6 when they find out they're really cowardly bounty hunters..
They wanted to show one way or the other that they have someone in that house which identified as the residents of OBL, they never showed the photo of his face, nor the result of his blood test proving that it was OBL that was killed on that day and in that house. The photo that published shows a man seating and watching TV, and photo was taken from behind, if you are a fool you would believe the writing saying that it is OBL, otherwise….. is anyone guess.
Can't answer?
Why?
You can't answer?
Why? You can't answer?
Why? You can't only not answer, you don't even know how to ask.
A good question is many things, but you missed every target on the firing range.