Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi has rejected the repeated Israeli threats to attack his nation in recent weeks, calling them “propaganda” and not a sign that a genuine attack is coming soon.
“It is our responsibility to take these threats seriously, but Israel is not in a position to do such a thing,” Salehi added in an interview published in an Iranian newspaper. Israeli officials, especially Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have been talking up an attack recently, with some reports saying it would come in the weeks leading up to the November US election.
Threats to attack Iran are not new, and both the US and Israel have been making such threats in some form or other off and on since the early 1980’s. The recent uptick has taken on a new spirit of earnestness in Israel, however, raising questions of if this time they actually mean it.
Threatening an attack for 30-odd years beforehand isn’t the greatest strategy, however, is it has given Iran a huge amount of lead-time in building defense systems and designing their military entirely around defending against such a strike.
bibi just wants more money, more money, more money so he will do anything and everything even if it would (war) kill him.
Are these these threats meant to boost the price of oil ?
Do bears crap in the woods? Do Israelis own oil stocks? Do members of AIPAC own oil stocks?
Boosting oil prices = hurting Obama's relection chances = having B. Netty's buddy Romney becoming President, a man more amenable to expending US blood and treasure for the sake of Israel.
Iran does. Ever heard of the Strait of Hermuz ?
Does B. Netty Tinpot have a Napolean complex?
You betcha;
I hope into "empty treats", but long history of Internacional Zionism – this truly Evil ideology – speek for itself. Wars and destructions followed always by Robbery of nations riches…peter czech
All nations involved are members of the UN. I was under the impression that a military threat on one of the members is a military threat on all other members. Well, impressions are obviously just that. The analogy is when the League of Nations did nothing when Mussolini threatened Abyssinia.
I am a bit concerned that only Israel/Zionism are always dragged up as he main nasties of the Middle East. In that category the House of Saud deserves the gold medal.
Peter I like almost every comment you make,and I come to this site everyday.America don't like the fact that Russia and China are not on a downward spiral like America and shortly after Israel.Things will probably get worse before better that is if the Neocon Zionist don't start a nucular WW3 that will leave no people alive.Commenting on Diddi and peter czech.Diddi Israel with other I mean none Zionist but kissing countrys is far more dangerous than the House Of Saud they have hundreds of illegal nucular weapons and a thing called the Sampson Option to go with over 70 broken UN resolutions more than the entire Mid East combined.Just think you should take that and many other things into consideration before saying such a thing.Remember the King David Hotel,The Lavon Affaire,The USS Lyberty and 9/11 to name a few.
This comment sighted coming from Iran suggest that in fact if an attack occurs the response to it will be proportional.
Why isn't every country in the world agitating to stop Israel's madness? Why isn't there a massive protest coming from the world's people? Is the idea of nuclear war seen as a diversion, something to watch on Tellie?
Wake up, world. Soon there will be no world!