The United Nations is still pushing for the Security Council to impose the establishment of a “safe zone” in northern Syria, arguing that it would allow civilians to escape the ongoing civil war and would make it easier for humanitarian aid to reach effected people.
Such a move would normally be fairly easy to push through, but has become contentious because several nations, including the US, have openly pushed the “safe zone” as a way to aid the rebels in the civil war, arguing that it could be used by the rebels as a place to retreat after offensives and to reorganize for future attacks.
This is of course hugely problematic, and militarizing the safe zone for the benefit of one side sort of defeats the whole purpose of removing civilians from combat. The fight will be one of many that the UN Security Council is likely to continue as France takes over the leadership role and pushes ever more loudly for a UN-endorsed invasion.
Russia and China have been opposing the idea of the UN imposing regime change on the country, and Russia reiterated their opposition today, noting that both sides continue to commit human rights abuses.
As I already said: The UN becomes a major tool of warfare for the USA.
Also Srebrenica was a save heaven for 15000 Muslim troops, that did slaughter people of many Serb villages around Srebrenica. (to feed and supply Srebrenica, according to Muslim troop commander Naser Oric (not sentenced or killed in The Hague).. It was a trap, telling the theater piece of bad bad Serbs who attack peaceful UN who did order US bombing killing Serbs.
The deaths of the escaping muslim army trough Serb territory were counted as massacred civilians, as planned by Izetbegovic, because they needed a good reason for NATO bombing.
The good reasons, i.e. killing many people, have been always provided, be it the bred chain massacre or Markale massacre.
Save heaven means always a save heaven for US-terrorists – against the people and Syria.
You can't fight an overt, or covert for that matter, ground war either directly, or by proxy, without 'supply lines'–especially when you are fighting against an established regime of a modern Nation with a professional military who has the 'support' of a significant segment, if not the majority, of the indigenous civilian population.
Establishing 'supply lines' in Syria by way of a loosely structured ragtag collection of forces (many with diametrically opposed interests) consisting of: lone militants, gangs, drug cartels, mercenaries, US civilian intelligence personnel, US special forces, special forces form other nations, covert infantry from various regional nations, and international terrorist organizations–along with various enterprising budding terrorist 'wannabe' organizations–most likely is difficult, in not essentially impossible for several reasons–especially if you want any sort of reasonable degree of confidence the 'supplies' sent will ultimately reach their intended destination–in the hands of the intended recipients–more often than not… That's why this is naturally the job for the "United Nations" and/or NATO…duh….
the UN is fishing in an empty pond