To hear Western officials talk, the rising violence in Syria is entirely the fault of the regime. If you listen to Russian officials, it is entirely the rebels who are to blame.
Gen. Robert Mood, the head of the UN monitoring mission, weighed in on the matter today, however, pointing out that both sides are to blame for escalating violence and that neither side seems particularly interested in the transition anymore.
Making matters worse, the fighting is taking place in cities, with both sides racking up significant civilian casualties in their assorted attacks and, according to UN officials, the monitors are being forced to pull back because it is just too dangerous to go certain places.
The monitors insisted that it wasn’t a formal pullback but a temporary one, and that they were hoping that the situation on the ground would stabilize and allow them to resume monitoring missions nationwide.
Syrian rebel mouthpiece the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights blasted the monitors again today, saying that they should “either work on stopping the killings or leave.” The rebels were condemning the ceasefire virtually from the day it began.
Either western officials are lying or…ooops, there’s no or. Western officials have lied on many occasions before.
“Syrian rebel mouthpiece, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, …”
Thank you Anti-war for calling a spade a spade.
It's clear who's at fault here… This isn't a "Kent State" situation the media would like it to be…unless the protesters at Kent State were firing AK-47s and laying out IEDs…which I don't believe they were.
There is a difference between "libertarianism" and "anarchism"…any serious person knows this. "Limited government" does not mean no government at all…and if a "government" cannot "rule"…what is the point of "government" in the first place? Is "government's" function simply to send out friendly suggestions via mail/e-mail/twitter/facebook, etc?
Additionally, there will never be a violent overthrow of the US federal government in any way shape or form in the future…no matter how many firearms are out there… Welcome to the 21st Century… Hello nuclear weapons…but nukes aren't the reason an internal conflict will never turn violent and lead to a "Civil War" within the US…at least one which is successful…there are other reasons for this…
We learn from the first two sentences that either Syria or the rebels are to blame.
Despite having sent many times here the following links, Jason Ditz never comes up the question if not foreign powers are to blame.
1. USA did plan war against Syria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DJ–Z3lvaQ
2. "peaceful unarmed civilians were armed from the beginning: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vLd_9c4WOU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCqmI1SQB5o
Advanced US anti-tank weapons from war lord Obama to its Syrian terrorists: debka.com/article/22017
3. US-organized revolutions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=en&v=lpXbA6yZY-8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr2XyIKHX1k
4. what happens in Syria: search "us army unconventional warfare"
5. Huge majority for Assad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt9A5rMqEDM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYlgDXP411w http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYQkUl-xwH0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSb0lxFcMn0
6. the real "brutal dictator": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8P6860vIiA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc4ZZ-yXaOQ
7: Media fraud: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x–Td_8JXYk
8.one of the many clear involvements of the Saudi extremists:
Father sells his (second) son as suicid-bomber to BABA AMR in Homs, Syria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuGhi-WlBEU