A spokesman for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon says that there is no “hard proof” that al-Qaeda was actually behind a number of high profile bombings against Syrian government targets, but did express concern about terrorist attacks in the country.
The spokesman, Martin Nesirky, said that the attacks were “clearly carried out by a group with organization and intent,” and that they did seem to follow the “familiar” style of such attacks elsewhere.
One of the attacks earlier this month, a bombing attack in Damascus, killed 70 people and wounded hundreds of others. Syrian officials cited this as proof of Western backing for al-Qaeda attacks in the country, while the rebels claimed the regime got al-Qaeda to bomb the buildings to make the rebels look bad.
Apparently determined not to give credence to either side, UN Special Envoy Kofi Annan expressed concern that the terrorists were a “third element” fighting in the civil war, distinct from either the regime or the rebels. This is a difficult case to make, however, since the terror attacks have exclusively targeted the regime.
Jason Ditz made this article very clever:
1. Those reading the headlines only (80%?) learn: " No ‘Proof’ "
2. Those reading 3 intro lines learn: that he actually said "no “hard proof”
3. Those reading further learn: Syrian government says the West has sent Al Qaida" to do it
4. Those reading further learn: Even rebels say it was Al Qaeda"
This is professional journalist education, that covers truth without covering it. Just using this trick of exploiting reader habits.
As in most war mongering mainstream media as deeper you go below the misleading headline you will find more relevant or sometimes even opposite information. Mostly the best is found in the comment sections.
And here even this requires another click at "discuss this article" to read comments. -another filter, since many do not recongnize it or do not want to write or discuss, but who would like to read comments of others.
Of course, no information at all why the UN spooksman sees only no "hard proof" and who else was it. No information about proof from Syrian governmement or the rebels. No question what is the aim of Al Qaida or any other party.
Never antiwar posted articles claiming that Al Qaida is actually "Al CIAda" which I have posted:
e.g. Syrian Girl – Why Al Qaeda is Al CIAda http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCqmI1SQB5o also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr2XyIKHX1k
Direct Saudi involvement is proofed here: father sells his son as suicid bomber for Baba Amr in Homs,Syria: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuGhi-WlBEU
Syria – The REAL Story CIA & MOSSAD Death Squads Exposed 21min http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_orfcGnaseE
Syria: Saudi admits "protesters" had weapons from the start http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vLd_9c4WOU
Ex-Blackwater Mercenaries Training Syrian Insurgency http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5k2uGXkyLc
There are also videos of terrorist training for Syria in Kosovo, the US muslim terrorists and drug dealer friends, which USA used to spark the so-called KOSOVO war, which was a war against Yugoslavia.
The reason Osama Bin Laden isn't wanted for the 9/11 attacks is the FBI has no hard proof. Lack of hard evidence didn't stop the US from invading Afghanistan.
Without long searching- If this video is no fake, it shows that the terrorist come from Saudi-Arabia=AlQaeda=CIA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuGhi-WlBEU