Violence is on the rise again in Syria today, and as usual the death toll has been followed by calls from the opposition for more direct armament from the international community. The prospect has been the subject of serious debate.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague has said that Britain is “ruling out” sending arms, but his Saudi counterpart Prince Saud al-Faisal endorsed the scheme, saying it was an “excellent idea.” The Arab League has already passed a plan, with Saudi backing, encouraging members to arm Syria’s rebels.
Where the US stands is still something of a mystery, as arming the rebels has been endorsed repeatedly by officials and political hopefuls, but the White House has once again said today that it isn’t going to commit to arming the rebels “at this point in time.” With open calls from Sen. John McCain (R – AZ) and others to funnel arms through other nations, the non-committal response might suggest behind-the-scenes negotiations are ongoing.
Despite the pretense of “desperation” among the rebels, the Free Syrian Army (FSA) already has considerable weaponry it looted from the Syrian military during its defection. Rumors have continued to swirl that the group, which is based in Turkey, has access to outside weaponry as well, and the fighters coming from Iraq at the behest of al-Qaeda are likewise arriving armed and ready for war.
While William Hague the british foreign minster wants to help Syrian people as a “common principals”, and Hillary Clinton call the Russia, China and their UN veto “Despicable”, one needs to know that: If Russia and China voted in favor of US and EU the NATO bombardments would have been started killing thousands of Syrian people by now and Turkey would started moving in with their army so as Israel. After all this has been a plan from 1990 when Paul Wolfwitz introduced the plan to Bill Clinton and later to George W. Bush whereby he started the Iraq war. Now that this plan is no longer effective and domed to be yet anther deceptive action by US and EU, now that people of Middle East recognizing the fact that all the bloodshed is about a falsified democracy orchestrated and presented by US and EU and that they are dealing with terrorists and those whom are bought by the west as their entities are behind all this, then it is time for Hillary Clinton and William Hague and rest of the US – EU democratic falsifiers start calling others with names and accusing them of everything, is like a child that lost its lollypop accusing the other child of stealing it not being able to prove that there was a lollypop to start with.
Now when they see the fact that their (US, EU & Saudis – UAE) intention is no longer effective and not working they are presenting a new yet more kind of a sophisticated fooling plan using the UN as their source of plan.., as if UN is the savior of their lost of respect among people and lost of their plan for occupying the entire Middle east. Historically from 1960s in Congo when the Swedish Dag Hamarsold, then secretary of UN give away the democratically elected president of Congo Patrice Lumomba to Mose Chombeh to be murdered, UN has become an instrument used and abused by US and EU; however, UN solders are from US, Sweden, Denmark, France, Italy, Spain and one or two other country then EU, though is shown that EU solders always taking side on behalf of their government protecting its interests then protecting the needy. This US and EU “New Plan” is simply a devious plan following the US and EU path in occupying the entire Middle east, or militarizing it totally.
Middle-East — Why give the West cheep oil in exchange for a fake democracy?
The Syrian Opposition, this is nothing more then a half dozen hardcore groups divided by strong ethnic and class ties and if they should win like they did in Libya, surely it will be civil wars unending like it now is in Libya.
Notwithstanding the condition of humanity, we people have the propensity to stop enriching ourselves upon the misery of another and turn all things toward the good, so what would it take for this to happen in Syria? For surely its a best-case condition for a complete reversal of Western dominance and expansion, for the Middle-East has everything to loose and nothing to win if Iran goes down the tube.