Documents retrieved from Libya are adding to the evidence of British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s intricate links with ousted Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi. A correspondence was kept up between the two, in which Blair referred to Gadhafi as “The Leader” and Blair was twice flown to Tripoli on one of Gadhafi’s private jets to touch base on issues like the release of the Lockerbie bomber as well as detained terror suspects.
Any news of whether the Lockerbie bombing was actually really Gaddafi's work?
Possibly true, however, Ghaddafi was a patsy like OBL.
Satan's brotherhood between the two, then Satan betrayed Satan.
NATO's decision to turn against Ghaddafi was partly opportunistic and partly an attempt to save face in the turmoil of the "Arab Spring." The US and its NATO flunkies were content to do business with Ghaddafi, because they are essentially shameless and will do anything that promises to turn a dollar. However, they do harbor grudges and when a rebellion broke out in Libya, they decided that the rebels were more pliable than Ghaddafi. Furthermore, there was the memory of his past defiance.
The "Arab Spring," when it broke out in Tunisia and Egypt, was a direct reaction against US policies as carried out by teh FedGov's Arab flunkies. Washington was caught with its pants down and floundered for some time. Things got really dicey when Bahrain erupted in protest – the FedGov fleet headquarters in the region was imperiled! The loyal regional flunkies were unleashed in a way that would never have happened in tranquil times to deal with this threat. Nevertheless, the FedGov is rarely without an offensive contingency for very long, and it was merely a matter of time before the inevitable co-opting of the "Arab Spring" got underway. The rebellion in Libya was the first opportunity to go on the offensive. Then, as weeks went on, the CIA and its Mossad allies began to carry out subversive activities in other Arab countries similar to those of the "color revolutions," with the added twist that armed groups would be used to create provocations that the target regimes could be relied upon to overreact against. It's the same policy that the US and Britain pursued in World War II with the partisan movements – kill enemy soldiers and provoke reprisals that can be spun in the domestic media as "proof" of the pure evil of the enemy.
Yes, yes, yes. And? Weren't there similar reports/evidence about links between Osama bin Ladden and Bush? Aaaaaaaaaaand?
Blair is as evil as they come his country is just not as strong as America is.Soon to be was.