Just days ago he was angrily condemning the US president for mentioning the 1967 borders, but in the wake of a high profile AIPAC speech by President Obama, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared himself “pleased” by the comments.
The comments were, by and large, a dramatic backpedal from the previous speech, declaring his undying support for Israel and promising that his mention of the 1967 borders didn’t really mean a literal end to the occupation of the lands Israel conquered in 1967.
Netanyahu wasn’t the only one condemning Obama in the wake of his previous comments, as a number of US politicians sought to establish themselves ahead of the 2012 elections by condemning Obama’s “betrayal” of Israel, which is to say his suggestion that maybe the occupation should be reversed at least partially through negotiation.
Netanyahu insisted that the comments today by Obama were “befitting” and that he was satisfied that the “clarification” was sincere. The peace talks, as always, are an afterthought and will remain frozen.
The US government is nothing but a mendacious den of thieves with Obama being the rug for war criminals like Netanyahu trample upon. The House, and Senate minus Dennis Kucinich, and Ron Paul are complicit with supporting, aiding, and abetting a known terrorist state being Israel. How low must we seem to the rest of the world??…pathetic!!
Not sure if I'd exclude Paul and Kucinich from he rest of the criminals in Congress. Ron Paul has been busy kissing Israeli ass lately.
Both parties are totally corrupted. Don't see any good coming from either one, ever.
We are all pictured as thugs and spoiled brats. Gangsters' kids who spit on everything outside of our own culture. There is nothing wrong with how the world sees the U.S. They can see. Those hypnotized by the zionist CFR controlled newscasts can not see. The CFR was investigated 1913 by Rep. Calloway. J.D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan and P. Warburg(for the Rothschild bank documented that they were undertaking controlling the news networks of the U.S. to "control the debate and therefore minds of the American people". They were so successful that about two years ago, SCOTUS judged that news networks are not legally obligated to tell the truth in newscasts, even on public airwaves. Since this decision, NPR has taken a dive into the sewer.
So many people hate the Muslims or the Christians or what not. Yet they are still here. You cant wipe out a religion. Its impossible. Thats why Israel is still around. Because it has established itself based on its religion.
A nice sentiment, but the wrong application. Israel exists today because of its skill in manipulating other nations in order to gain financial and military superiority, not because of Judaism itself. You cannot equate Judaism to the state of Israel, no matter how much Bibi and Co. would like you to- case in point: if the Palestinians were granted full rights as Israeli citizens, how long do you think Israel would be dominated by Jews? Not long, and soon it would become a de facto non-Jewish state. The birth rates are unequal, and Israel has to import settlers to maintain any sort of population parity- and so far, it's slow going but they're just not keeping up. The response? Import more settlers and place them in illegal settlements on Palestinian land and string out the world as long as they can over the issue.
No one is trying to 'wipe out' Judaism, though- I have all the respect for observant Jews, What I DON'T have respect for is the state of Israel- as a state, it is one of our greatest liabilities in the political realm and the slavish devotion to AIPAC is what will be the vehicle of our eventual downfall- we already see the signs. But to conflate this with Judaism itself is wrong. State =/= religion.
Israel has established itself because it is not hemmed in by the truth or exhibiting good will in any direction. and the largest economic cabal on earth wants to control the suez canal and the oil fields of the mid-east. These things lead to campaign money by the truckload.
Sure, such is the case when one kisses Zionist ass. That kind of thing, laden with billions of dollars and all the military hardware in the world pleases the masters so.
I wonder if last week's closed door meeting between Obama and Netanhyahu went something like this:
"Yassuh, massa, I's be fixin' it. Ah dint mean te say alla dat an makin' you look bad. Please, massa Bibi, don' be mad wif me agin', I's be promisin' a goood speech dis time, yassuh. "
Smile, boy, smile- you know de massa be watchin'.
WTF? WHY Do all US Politicians think it's crucial to swear fealty to AIPAC & Israel?
First off I would like to say I love all GODly people including Jews.But for the truth from real Jews type into your computer-Rabbi Weiss Outside Annapolis Peace Conference Criticizing Israel Government Racist Zionist ld. He will tell how they twist there religion to Zionism.(PEACE)
Is all oratory by the US/EU-NATO capitalism system.., is from within the systems nature talking for the US/NATO interests with continues of the same policies toward nations in Middle East.., one thing is for sure.., anything and everything that any US president been saying about a Palestinians states for last 20 years or so have turn out to be rhetoric saving the US and EU emporium interests to begin with.
The only change here is that Barack Hussein Obama is point out the notion presented by Saudis 5-10 years ago into his speech asking for Israel to go back to 1967 Israeli borders.., in that regard Israel already have rejected the idea.., which means that there is not going to be any peace no matter what Obama have said or going to say or for that matter the up coming president; nonetheless’ throughout the years Israel has rejected anything and everything that practically been presented to them. In the other hand and in regard to what happening in Middle East and Libya.., once again a US president been humiliated by Israel rejecting the idea in peace or for that matter establishing a Palestinians States making sure that the Middle East turmoil is going to continue benefiting Israel political demands asking for more change all over the Middle East.., today is Hama’s, tomorrow is Iranian, after tomorrow is Saudi Arabia and later Israel will demand for US to remove President Chaves in Venezuela or the Chinas communist regime for Israel to negotiate with Palestinians. So the question is: where would it end and when would the US wars ends.
Talking about peace between Islamic sects is yet another reelection party line based on Obama doctrine mimicking Jimmy Carter doctrine.., regarding religious democracy and how to achieve it in Middle East.., but the idea behind democracy no matter how you look at it is not based on religion.., so by US and EU establishing and supporting Muslims Brotherhood is establishing another dictatorial regime which would not work for democracy and Israel will reject to that as well.
Here, Iran and Iraq are example of what kind of ”democracy” that Obama is talking about.., or for that matter Bahrain and other royal tyrants family which Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Power and Obama is protecting., the brutality, murdering and displacing Sunnis or Shiites’ or Christianity is a daily happening in Iraq, the brutal Saudis or Bahraini or Iranian regime killing of its people, Israel militarism regime hand in hand with its religious fundamentalisms killings of Palestinians.., the non existing freedom of speech, the non existing rights of women and or political parties.., and whatever is there is only based on religious framed laws; therefore the notion that there will be a peace and democracy later in time is ridicules by itself.
Mr. Obama.., Israel is designed and based on idea in Zionism.., as US and EU are imperialism.., here there is that idea .., Zionism and Imperialism.., bounding US/NATO and Israel which in reality all the party have a common goal and that is: by dividing it they would rule the world.., it started many years ago and been active since then.., here for US to show the world that the US idea is truly based on democracy, it needs to separate itself from AIPAC.., AIPAC is representing Israel interests in US.., therefore it is not a peace core nor a American social movement but rather a economical and political movement that Israel have built in US.., penetrating the US social political and economic system .., here by US government ignoring that influence and not acting on be half of American people whom are demanding such separation then US militarism is going to be at war to when its ends.., that is to say if it ends.
Having said that: democracy is a two way street leading to all other junctions.., limiting it then is going to be a one way street.., therefore, for last 50 years or so is all been talks and no actions from US or EU to force Israel to accept the fact that they cannot go around calling themselves the only democracy in the region receiving all kind of economical and political help from US and EU while it is Israel who sabotaging the peace and forthcoming of a democratic government of Palestine.., while such behavior been one of the reasons for uprising of religious fundamentalism in Middle East .., so if Obama wants peace then Israel have to be forced to accept the peace plan accepting what the Palestinians are formed of.., if not.., then boycott the country and reject all kind of payment to Israel.., ($whatever the billions amount is that US annually paying to Israel) . As US and EU have done to Iraq.., doing it to Libya and Syria and other nation in Middle East.., then for the sake of peace US and EU needs to boycott Israel.., then and only then Obama doctrine is about democracy and not just a rhetoric in peace or democracy.., otherwise as many president before the entire matter is just another re-election lies as before. Above is what we said last week.., we say it again.., Obama is not the man nor he ever be.
If Israel were to nuke Chicago tomorrow, Congress would immediately pass a resolution in full support of Israel's action
You people are both delusional and anti semitic. Admit it, you would not be upset if every Israeli was murdered. You are are not anti war. You only oppose wars that do not fit in with your ideology. I do not expect you to post this message You do not have the intellectual honesty to deal with the opposition