US troops marched through a poor neighborhood in western Kandahar this morning, searching homes and making promises of future aid in something officials are calling a “preview” of the summer offensive.
The latest move comes as NATO continues to reel from a Taliban attack on the Kandahar Airport on Saturday night, their largest base in the region. The attack came as two top British officials, Foreign Secretary William Hague and Defense Secretary Liam Fox, were scheduled to fly into the base.
The Kandahar attack was the third major Taliban attack against a NATO target in the past few days, amid growing fears that the Taliban is changing strategy to avoid attacking the largely ineffectual Afghan military and hit the international occupation forces directly.
But Kandahar is even more significant than the attacks in Kabul, as it is the focus of a massive, long-promised US-led offensive to begin at some point this summer.
Officials say the Kandahar offensive is the best chance they have to displace the Taliban from their home city, but increasingly there are doubts that the plan is anything more than a public relations stunt, a pledge to deploy massive amounts of troops and aid and magically transform a city full of skeptical Afghans into loyal supporters of the NATO-backed government.
The worst news about the doubts is that the US really doesn’t have any backup strategy for when this, as so many past plans, fails. The massive offensive is constantly being rebranded to convince people that it has promise, but in reality it is the all-or-nothing culmination of the McChrystal Plan for escalating the war, a plan which the Pentagon is increasingly doubting.
The center of the insurgency, Kandahar makes all the sense in the world as a goal for NATO, but between the massive corruption in the provincial government, the tiny and ill-trained (and in many cases completely untrained) police force and a local populace that resents NATO at least as much as it resents the Taliban, it is not exactly fertile ground for a NATO strategy which is still, months later, struggling to bring a largely fictional town of Marjah under control.
Question? What is NATO's business being in Afghan? Cheap oil brought to Europe and not beingdependant on Russia ! Lying Thieves :^/
The trap is set.
The hilarious part is the US has mostly trapped itself, while the opposition, which includes most Afghans, watches with growing and knowing archaic smiles.
They have seen all this before–over millennia.
The US is new only in the degree of incompetence its military leadership has shown.
yeah as we blow the shit out of them costa
In the immediate area of Kandahar are roughly a million Afghans.
The area is easily accessible to about another million Afghans, scattered about, and also to Pashtuns and others.
The insurgency itself is rhizomatic, and calling it "Taliban" is an error.
The Afghans in the Army are not reliable US allies–why would they be?
Only a complete military moron would implicate foreign troops in such an environment, and only 20-30,000 of them at that.
The insurgents are sending one another a message– Airport, Logistics, Airport.
Try it out as a dance step. The US will be dancing to it soon.
corr: "and also to Pashtuns over the border"
I am posting here to advise that either antiwar.com or intense debate has a Hasbara mole as gatekeeper of comments critical of Israel. If you use the terms J*w or Z**nist in your commen, itt will be flagged, held back for "approval", and then, if critical of Israel, "disappeared".
Don't believe me? Test it yourself. Try a one word post. One word. J*w, but spelled out. Same with Z**nist, but spelled out.
So save your comments before posting, and if the post is rejected — and believe me, it will be, and it will never reappear — go through the post and "sanitize" as necessary.
Your right.
jeff_davis, you are correct. They used to "hold" some of my comments for some articles, but now they're deleting immediately. Do the authors of the articles have administrator privileges? This would explain the selective nature of the censorship. Also, they seem to have profile names pegged to the immediate deletion. Just for kicks, at one article where this was happening, I tried to post a completely innocuous sentence: "Brazil is a beautiful country with many fine people." It was immediately deleted.
P.S. Deo Vindice! 😉
OK… So there is a Kandahar "district" as well as a Kandahar "city". No? I was beginning to think how absurd it would be to claim you're about to engage in an offensive in a place you're already standing at. Much like the previous "campaign" in a rural area was made to sound like the second coming of Stalingrad.
It appears that McChrystal has absolutely no idea the fix he has put the troops around Kandahar in.
In typical American military Walt Disney fashion, he may have thought the threat of attacking the city would be enough to change the military and political situation on the ground.
But to have to deliver on the threat will be a disaster.
The only real question is how much of a disaster, and how far it can be covered up by PR.
One wonders whether there are middle level officers in the area sending up memoranda to the effect that, well, General what you are getting at is impossible, lunatic, and will be suicide for my men.
As for leveling Kandahar like Fallujah–Afghanistan is not Iraq.
Do that and the US and NATO will be in an even more untenable position.
Maybe Afghanistan will be the wheel that breaks the NATO butterfly. That would be an unintended benefit from this fiasco.