In a meeting designed to reassure the most hawkish elements of Congress that the war in Afghanistan isn’t going to undergo any sort of radical change, President Obama has reportedly assured that the so-called “Biden Option” is officially off the table.
A long time advocate of war in Afghanistan, and indeed most everywhere else, Vice President Joe Biden has reportedly come to the conclusion that the disastrous war in Afghanistan is no longer worth the effort and has been advocating more scaled back goals and a refocusing of attacks along the Pakistani border.
Though a growing number of Congressional Democrats object to the McChrystal plan of adding another 45,000 troops, and the New York Times is reporting that there is growing support for the Biden position, the administration has sought to assure that it isn’t an either-or proposition and that Biden’s calls to escalate drone strikes might yet be implemented in addition to a ground escalation.
It was only a few months ago that the Obama Administration had insisted that the 21,000 troops they already added was all that would be considered in 2009, but a worsening war is increasing pressure on the president to double down and he is widely expected to add at least another 10,000 troops in the short term.
The New York Times was reporting yesterday that the "Biden Option" isn't the "significant reduction in troops" the London Times is reporting it is: http://wp.me/pnWUd-22n
From my understanding, the "Biden Option" is a remobilization of troops to the border, away from policing, to underplay the perception of propping up Kabul with the strategy shift of an 'intel surge' and strong-arming the Pak gov't to put ISAF troops alongside the Pak Army on the ground. I could be wrong, but Obama officials said after that meeting that a "significant reduction in troops" wasn't even an option on the table, yet the "Biden Option" still is, from what I gathered in that NYT report.
We are debating sending more troops to Afghanistan to protect Afghans. Yet, we apparently do not have the wherewithal to protect Americans from border crossers since we are moving "hundreds" of Border Guards from our insecure Mexican border to the Canadian border. See more at: http://www.thebutter-cutter.com/Protecting_Americ…