The Sunday “sabotage” on oil tankers off the coast of the United Arab 
Emirates warrants a “thorough investigation,” according to US Ambassador
 to Saudi Arabia John Abizaid, who told reporters that he wants responses “short of war” to be taken.
Other officials indicated on Monday that they consider Iran the main 
suspect of the attack, though they have conceded that they don’t have 
any real evidence of this, let alone proof. Abizaid said starting a war 
over it would not be in the interest of Iran, the US, or Saudi Arabia. 
Which is a potentially controversial position for the ambassador to 
take, given the ongoing US military buildup in the Middle East, centered
 around the idea of a war with Iran. Even if he believes this isn’t in 
America’s interest, nor justified on unproven allegations of sabotage, 
it seems to be the general direction the US is headed anyhow. 
In particular, the idea of having a thorough investigation before the 
reaction is not the way the US has done things in recent years. At a 
time when hawks are lining up to call for action against Iran on any 
pretext, it is vital to hear the call to let cooler heads prevail.
U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia Urges Response ‘Short of War’ to Gulf Tankers Attack
 Wants a thorough investigation before reaction
			Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
			Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
    ×
    
      ![Image Preview]() 
    
  


