The finalization of the new US tax cut has hawks shifting focus toa new press for yet more military spending, while at the same time disagreeing about whether the cuts are an obstacle to such spending, or could facilitate even more.
Obama-era officials, in particular, were very outspoken in criticizing the tax cuts for their impact on the national debt, suggesting they would inevitably lead to cuts in “national security” spending as a result.
Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), however, saw the tax cuts doing the exact opposite, predicting it would lead to an economic boom, and increased revenue for the government, which could be funneled toward the military.
Having already pushed through a massive military spending increase for next year, the expectation is more large increases to come every year going forward. President Trump has suggested that permanently ending sequestration would be a good move toward that end, though in practice sequestration never really happened, leaving open the question of what formally eliminating it even will mean.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Major Clashes in Libyan Capital, at Least 20 Killed, Airport Closed - January 15th, 2018
- Aid Cranes Arrive at Key North Yemen Port of Hodeidah - January 15th, 2018
- Russia FM: Zone for US-Backed Rebels Could Split Syria - January 15th, 2018
- Syrian Army Vow to End US Presence in Syria - January 15th, 2018
- Syrian Rebels Push US to Resume Failed CIA Arms Smuggling Scheme - January 15th, 2018