Though it almost certainly isn’t going to lead to any legal repercussions, Lt. Gen Michael Flynn, the incoming National Security Adviser, has raised some eyebrows with media reports that he had five phone calls with the Russian Ambassador to the United States on the day President Obama announced a flurry of anti-Russia sanctions.
All five calls were reportedly between the time Russia heard about the sanctions, which included the expulsion of 35 diplomats, and the announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that no retaliatory action would be taken. The calls were believed to be reassurances by Flynn, as a key figure in the incoming administration, that the measures would be rolled back after the inauguration.
It may, however, also be a violation of the Logan Act, a 1799 act which forbids any private citizen of negotiating with a foreign government without explicit permission of the current government. Flynn presumably did not have such permission from the Obama Administration, though since he was already set to become part of the government less than a month later, assurances on the policies of that future government seem a gray area.
The Logan Act was initially passed by Congress after Dr. George Logan, a pacifist from Pennsylvania, went to France to advise the French government on ways to avoid a war with the United States, which many saw as increasingly likely at the time. Logan’s effort was successful, but anger among hawks at him getting in the way of a big US-France war led to an act that would criminalize future such efforts.
In practice, the Logan Act has been virtually completely disused, except as a rhetorical tool. Only a single indictment ever happened under the act, in 1803 against a Kentucky farmer who advocated secession of the western half of the then-US to ally with France. The farmer was never prosecuted, however, as the Louisiana Purchase effectively ended the question by absorbing the neighboring large French colonial territory into the US.
I am lost here. The incoming president and his closest associates routinely have contacts with any number of countries of interest or importance. US and Russia are not at war, and while the noisy part of the establiishment is certainly spoiling for one — a good chunk of US population is very much for friendly relations with Russia, and views Russia’s president as one of the greater leaders of our time. While those cannot be heard in contred MSM — it is rather obvious in a wide range of conservative alternative media. US is far from a consensus that Russia is an enemy. And Congress may posture now, as President elect has no power yet. At this point we should be gratefull to the skills of Rex Tillerson for working within Congressional delision _to get them iff the ledge.
Gee Bianca, you’re so wrong.
1. The US and Russia are at war.
2. Only a small part of the US population is for friendly relations with Russia. That’s not what Trump was chosen for. It’s more accurate to say that he was chosen in spite of that claim.
3. Putin is one of the world’s greatest leaders but definitely not in the eyes of many Americans. The question hasn’t been asked so it’s hard to find a survey on it but I would estimate it to be only about 10%.
I would like to challenge you on #3. Can you show something to back up your assertion?
Dec 15, 2016 Why The U.S. Is Demonizing Russia
To Cover Up Failure In Syria In this video, Rachel Blevins looks at how both the mainstream media and the U.S. government are working overtime to condemn Russia and Syria for the current state of Aleppo, even if it means relying on false information..
https://youtu.be/6rDVEwLwulY