In new comments today at a European security conference, Secretary of State John Kerry again played up the idea that a political transition in Syria, which he reiterated would have to mean the immediate removal of President Bashar Assad, would be a game-changer for the ongoing war.
Incredibly, Kerry termed the removal of Assad not only a “boon for everyone,” but claimed that ISIS would be totally destroyed “in a matter of months” with this transition toward a rebel-dominated government.
Interestingly, the narrative of a rebel-government unity being the key to beating ISIS had been Russia’s talking point, and spurned by the US, but now the State Department are adopting a variation, with Assad’s removal their primary goal.
This is also the closest anyone in the administration has come to a timetable for defeating ISIS, preposterous though it may be. The “matter of months” claim is likely considered harmless by the administration since there is no real chance of Assad voluntarily turning over the government to pro-US rebels.
The notion of Assad’s ouster as a cure-all is also politically controversial, with Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz suggesting that keeping Assad in power was important to keeping the US secure, noting the recent problems with ousted dictators elsewhere in the region.
Interesting position being staked out by Cruz. Someone on the right taking a position that makes some strategic sense and goes against current Washington policy.
Cruz has been positioning himself as Trump's Mini-Me from fairly early on, hoping to replace The Donald when his wheels finally come off, and aping those positions of Trump's that seem most likely to continue to resonate through next November with the general electorate.
Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. But like most politicians, the only thing anyone can be relatively sure that Ted Cruz believes is that Ted Cruz should continue to collect a government paycheck.
"the only thing anyone can be relatively sure that Ted Cruz believes is that Ted Cruz should continue to collect a government paycheck"
True, but of course he is not there for the government's paycheck, that is only the ticket to ride on the donor gravy train.
but remember, for congresscritters, the government paycheck never ends. "serve" just
one two-year stint and you collect that 180,000 (?) for life, along with various other
benefits, including free non-obamacare healthcare.
That really makes for a nice narrative…but…it's not true. Sorry…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_pensi…
he'll be the Adelson spare ….in case Rubio doesn't work out.
Except that he's one of those harvard lawyers. We've had a couple of those in government. We should know better than to trust anything at all they say.
ALSO, odd man, Dana Rohrabacher, rightwinger from CA has said we should be applauding the Russians and stop talking about regime change!! why are they suddenly sounding so RATIONAL??
So he's saying that after Assad "is removed" the US will reign in "IS."
Kerry's idea is totally insane. Anyway the Syrian people are the ones who make that decision. Not America. Also who is included in the boon for everyone?
The article doesn't even begin to plumb the depths of Kerry's insanity. For that you have to read the New York Times:
NICOSIA, Cyprus — Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday he believes that if an agreement can be reached to ease President Bashar al-Assad of Syria from power, a coalition of Americans, Russians and Syrian forces could wipe out the Islamic State “in a matter of literally months.”
So, Kerry wants the Russians and the Syrians to die to advance the national interests of the United States. And then it gets even better:
He also said that “without the ability to find some ground forces that are prepared to take on Daesh,” using an Arabic acronym for the group, “this will not be won completely from the air, and we know that.” But he was not specific about where those ground troops would come from. His aides later said they would have to be indigenous.
So now the SAA and the jihadis are going to fight ISIS together. Yeah, I can just see them all sat around the camp fire, singing Kumbaya and toasting effing s'mores……………the man is an imbecile. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/world/middleeas…
Kerry is an enigma. It s harrowing to believe anyone as stupid as he appears to be can be appointed to so crucial an office as Sec/State. If he is this dumb and totally lacking in basic knowledge of the realties of the world, then it's small wonder we are in this unholy Mideast mess. I suppose he hasn't noticed that every state in which we tossed out the leader has descended into chaos and terrorism. Ukraine, Libya, Iraq and now giving Syria our best effort to throw out the ONLY secularist left in the region.
Kerry lives in la la land! Rumsfeld said the same about the Iraq war it 'would only take week/months'. Routing Qaddafi was also supposed to be equally quick. Kerry and the coalition can't even control the blood thirsty ISIS murderers and they still can't control the Libyan rebels who ended up blowing up Benghazi Embassy.
"Fool me once" Putin will not roll over again after NATO double crossed him and used the 'no fly zone' he agreed to for a 26K blitzkrieg on unarmed Libyans and murdered Qaddafi in cold blood. Under an age old agreement with Syria, Russia is the only Nation with any legitimacy in Syria. Not US, Not UK and Not Turkey. Kerry can go roger himself.
"Benghazi Embassy"???
Yes Benghazi Embassy.in Libya. Hillary's rebels responsible for the death of US Ambassador Christopher Sevens and the rocket attack on the Embassy using US supplied Stinger missiles.
The issue is that it wasn't an embassy, not even a consulate but a CIA station used to run weapons for terrorists.
People still have the funny idea that the State Department doesn't do violent regime change, so they believe that when an ambassador is killed, it has to be the result of incompetent security at an embassy.
Agreed. Remember vividly Hillary shocked appearance when she realized they were 'her' mob who attacked the compound
Sounds like sour grapes! As for Putin's respect for legitimacy … Ukraine.
Sure Kerry, how did Iraq work out for you guys when Saddam was deposed? Not to mention Libya which has become a hotbed for terrorists.
The State Dept is also circulating a story tonight that ISIS has lost so much revenue it is teetering on collapse. In fact, Wash Post runs that above this story, about imminent collapse as soon as Assad goes.
Who believes this stuff? Apparently those who need to believe it, on the same theory as the husband caught by his wife in bed with his mistress, "Who are you going to believe Darling, your loving husband or your lying eyes."
"We can defeat (disband?) ISIS in months if ASSAD goes"
What more proof do we need that the US is using ISIS as its ally in its plans for regime change and that they have no intention of disbanding ISIS until they have achieved their objective.
Kerry is a war-monger who's main role is to sow deception and disinformation. I expect he gets his briefings from Tel Aviv.
Kerry is delusional. The man, just like his equally delusional boss, simply won’t let go of the bone.
ISIS, of course, cannot be defeated. No insurgency ever can. But keeping Assad in power bogs Putin down in an unending and unwinnable guerilla war.
Really, you're as bad as Kerry – insurgencies can and have been defeated – for instance, the communists in Malaya and the Dhofar Rebellion in Oman to name just two.
Only if Turkey, NATO, and President Zero, stop supporting ISIS and the other Sunni Jihadist terrorist groups and secure Turkey's damn border instead of turning a blink eye.
Did anyone at this so-called European security conference bother to ask him specifically how they were going to "totally destroy" ISIS and how was Assad stopping them from doing so now?
But really, this isn't about defeating ISIS. This is about doing to Syria exactly what the US did to Iraq – turn Syria into another failed state with no infrastructure and no manufacturing and no way of generating revenue. Once Syria is reduced to rubble, then the vultures in Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel and the US will proceed to parcel out what's left.
And if they haven't figured it out yet, Jordan and Lebanon ought to be planning their own defense.
Let's not forget about Gen. Wesley Clark's testimony. Seven nations were on the original hit list: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.
Iraq and Libya: done.
Syria: in progress.
Somalia and Sudan: uh, someone update me, please.
Lebanon and Iran: next. ISIL, or its next iteration, aren't done with the job yet.
What CLARK was ACTUALLY talking about was a plan that has been on the books since 1982!! it was written for/by israelis published in their World Zionist Journal in 1982 and translated by Dr Israel SHAHAK and is available online just search on YINON PLAN for greater Eretz ….INTENTIONAL plan to destroy into smallest sectarian parts each major M/E state..starting with IRAQ. The pentagon's exuberance was to follow thru in 5 yrs…but for some reason they did not contemplate on rejection by the PEOPLES of those countries REJECTING the destruction of their homelands no matter how swell "Democracy" was made to appear….How willing would you be to allow absolute bombing destruction of your homeland to be 'new and improved'?? hell no way…
Kerry, another insufferable 'indispensable and exceptional' lunatic US mentality like another people that thought they were 'uber alles'.
Yeah, I heard that one before: We'll wreck the country in order to save it! It's becoming the American answer to all problems.
Is Kerry practicing for a post-administration role of stand up comic? Yesterday he said the NORTH ATLANTIC Treaty Organization was a completely defensive organization and no threat to anyone. Ha, ha, ha. Tell that one to Gaddafi.
It's getting surreal. Recently Dana Rohrbacher said that something was wrong with NATO, and that if Turkey was in it we should get out. Exactly.