Days after the announcement of a framework deal between Iran and the P5+1, Israel is still inconsolably outraged, and the Obama Administration is still trying to reassure them that the war Prime Minister Netanyahu has been rooting for could happen.
That was the message of top Obama Aide Ben Rhodes, who gave an interview Monday night on Israel’s Channel 2 insisting that “all options are on the table,” including military options, if the US decides the Iran deal isn’t working.
That’s a slight step back from Defense Secretary Ash Carter, who last week insisted that the US could sign a deal with Iran and them immediately attack them anyhow if they felt like it.
Israeli Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz is also still talking up the chances of a unilateral Israeli attack on Iran aimed at derailing the deal, saying Israel has a right to decide to attack Iran whenever it wants to.
There are three governments that you should not trust, 1-capitalism. 2-fake democracy. 3-fakes religious that have a very good relation with Netanyahu which makes USG, Saudi arabia or wahabbis "Arabia" presenting all the above.
It's easier to count up the governments that you should trust than the ones you shouldn't — because there are none of the former. The next state which is trustworthy will be the first state which is trustworthy.
Trusting a people's governments is when you trust people with their judgment chosing a government to govern a nation. Capitalism is not the people choice nor the system is chosen by the people, the governing system is Simply auctioned to highest bidder. religious dictatorial regims as Saudis, are not chosen by the people but they are there to have a family business while governing and presenting a falsified religious as if they where God. The last but not least is a falsified democracy as israel always been, a apartheid system created by western falsified and to some points non existing democracy, as monarchism in England and some other european nations as sweden and those U.S. senator who are for monarchism/dictatoril regime but called hawks supporting all the above. If there were no government, no social laws people with no respect to people's choice would start social anarchy as to a point exists in all the above social systems, both economic and social politics. If that's what you predicting or advocating, good luck with kind of "democracy" you are advertising for. Democracy needs to include the majority of people, if such idea was the majority and reasons for not being or becoming majority is not because of people but rather where the advocator have no prospect for democracy. Having all kind of ideas without being specific about it, creates more of anarchism then a functioning democracy as its happening in USA or Europe with militarism taking over democracy.
…. that “all options are on the table,” including military options….,
All options means a war of aggression, and the threat itself is a war crime against humanity.
Any deal with the potential to save human lives is a good one.
Chicken hawks on AIPAC's payroll (love) to talk about (war).
As long as they're (not) the ones fighting it.
I am still chuckling at the "deal" – Iran traded the manufacture of nuclear weapons which they never had any intention to doing. Israel lied that that was Iran's sole purpose in life and they did their usual splendid job of lying until the West imposed sanctions. Now, Iran is still not interested in building nuclear weapons, and the sanctions are gone. Now expect the usual madness when a scorpion manages to sting itself.
I'm thinking the Saudis jumped the gun and the NeoCon plan had to shift — hence this laughable treaty.
If we attack Iran, let's make sure to attack the Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline from Iran to Israel to make sure those darned Iranians can't sell their oil.
Oh, wait- I'll bet if we do attack, that particular target will be well off-limits. Ya think?