The US war against ISIS isn’t going very well in Iraq, but those struggles pale in comparison to the war in Syria, where the US strategy is in outright tatters, and its few allies falling apart.
The decision to attack al-Qaeda along with ISIS at the start of the war is looking like a serious blunder, as al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front turned on US-armed “moderate” factions, and has routed them almost entirely out of the north.
The Hazm Movement, one of the bigger CIA-armed rebel factions, officially dissolved this past week after losing the last of their bases to Nusra in Aleppo Province.
Though the US still has some allies along the Jordan border, these too are entirely at the mercy of al-Qaeda, and would likely be wiped out quickly if Nusra turned on them as well.
Having made an enemy of ISIS, Nusra, and the Assad Government, the US is essentially at war with all meaningful factions, while the smaller groups, to the extent they even still exist, continue to tear each other apart.
That leaves the Pentagon hoping to create a new “ally” in a year or two, and other officials openly talking about trying to spin al-Qaeda as a relatively moderate faction just so they have somebody meaningful to arm.
Neither seems likely to work, and so the US war in Syria is likely to just mean intermittent airstrikes to benefit Kurdish factions that the US can’t officially deal with because they’re listed as terrorist organizations, and no progress anywhere.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- US-Led Airstrikes Killed 472 Civilians in Syria in the Past Month - June 23rd, 2017
- US Narrows Counter-Extremism Program to Focus on Islamists - June 23rd, 2017
- Senator: US Strikes on Syrian Forces 'Unlawful' - June 23rd, 2017
- Kurds Warn Turkey's Buildup in North Syria Threatens Raqqa Invasion - June 23rd, 2017
- Senators Seek Clarification on US Role in Yemen Torture - June 23rd, 2017