Since the US began its airstrikes against Syria, the name Khorasan has been on everyone’s lips since, along with ISIS, they’ve become a top target.
It’s puzzling for people in Syria, especially those affiliated with the rebellion, because none of them have ever heard of any such faction. Indeed, the evidence is increasingly that the US made it up.
“The name is clearly US-originated,” noted analyst Pieter van Ostaeyen, who says that the name had never been mentioned by any jihadist movements until the US started talking them up.
Rather, what is being referred to by the administration as Khorasan is simply al-Qaeda. When the US attacks “Khorasan” they’re really attacking Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Qaeda’s Syria group, and don’t want to admit it because the “moderate” rebels are all closely allied with al-Qaeda. But they aren’t allied with Khorasan because there is no such thing.
The name is also a political convenience, so that when the TSA says the “Khorasan” is a threat to US flights, what they’re really saying is that al-Qaeda is a threat to US flights, hardly news, but a damning admission that 13 years of focusing on al-Qaeda in a global war hasn’t amounted to a hill of beans, and the threat is still there.
They don’t want to admit that, so instead they invented the fiction of Khorasan to cover up the truth.
Khorasan, is a regional area in north east of Iran close to Afghanistan. The Americans would never guessed that, so they just find a name hard for people to know about or understand to fool them more then last time.
It should be – more THAN last time, not more then last time.
Than compares items, then is similar to until.
Good response.
I think that (the Iranian factor) is precisely why the boys @ Langley chose the name Khorasan. Just to create a fictional link between al Qaeda and its sworn enemy Iran.
You just can't make up stuff like this!
rofl!
I don't know – As Bill Maher says, "they pull this stuff out of their ass".
Classic.
Shocking that the sadist Obama would manufacture such a lie.
…but they did. And as expected, the American ignorant class bought it hook-line-and-sinker.I'm betting it was the gnomes in the Pentagon and State who created this spectre – and then laid it all on Obama at some conference table deep in the bowels of the WH. He couldn't dream this up – no imagination. This has State/Pentagon/CIA all over it.
It's also possible that our good friends in Jerusalem whispered in the US ears they own and suddenly it's a crisis. They are so very good at creating reality out of thin air, after all.
Just like the 40,000 Yazidi refugees on a mountain top in Iraq which turn out to be 500, and nobody even knew they existed.
Illusions of good hiding an intent to be enriched upon our misery, mental darkness, what Empire USA is all about.
It is because ISIS does not sound so foreign ,Islamic and so very frighting to American simplistic minds.Khorasan does all that and more.
The entire War on Terror is a lie from beginning to end. The WOT is nothing more than a sugar coating to mask the real agenda as explained in Zbignew Brezinskies's 1997 book. THE GRAND CHESSBOARD.
Of course it is a made up excuse to justify their illegal bombing campaign on Syria. Remember, most monsters who serve in our govt today are LAWYERS (LIARS) and just like how the Nazis justified all their crimes via legal wrangling Obama and Republicans are doing the same.
The question is, did Obama know it was made-up?
If not the generals and spooks have really taken over and Obama can be filed in the same drawer as Colin Powell.
Colin Powell did know beforehand that the "intelligence" he presented was garbage.
Both still deserves to be filed under 'Stooge'.
The American presidency is nothing more than a stage prop, the president an actor, the script is written by the Pentagon-CIA-National Security State. No important decisions can be made by an 'elected official'. Carter was the last one who had to find that out the hard way. Since then everybody who is anybody knows the score.
The fourth paragraph I think aligns best with the situation, be it not so much there being a close alliance between "moderate" rebels and al Qaida, but rather one of (temporary) convenience against Assad, where the US attacking and weakening al Nusra (al Qaida affiliates) but not Assad's troops threatens the plan to use these " moderates" as proxies against ISIS, rather than have American troops on the ground complicating things further and unnecessarily. If it actually works it seems to me to be have been worth it, to bend the truth a little bit. After all it's hardly a grand detour from reality.
Mohsin al-Fadhli: oops, here one minute, gone the next! can it get any crazier?
Jerusalem Post: Leader was al-Qaida affiliate Osama bin Laden and among the few who knew in advance about the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks
DUBAI – A Twitter account run by an al-Qaida member said the leader of the al-Qaida-linked Khorasan group was killed in a US air strike in Syria, SITE monitoring service said on Sunday, following several days of uncertainty over whether he survived the raid…
SITE did not name the jihadist who reported Fadhli’s death but said he had trained under a close associate of al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahri and had fought in Khorasan before traveling to Syria….
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Khorasan-leader-…
Not the first nor the last time names are made up. And they are OBVIOUS, but it seems to work. Khorasan is clearly neocon joke — to have Iran in whatever way linked to terrorism. And they can do it — they have press eating out of their hand. Thus, Iran is friendly to Syria — hence, mysterious Khorasan. But no different is AQAP, AQIM, AQIM — Al-Qaeda in — Arabian Penninsula, Mezopotamia, Maghreb…. As if Al-Qaeda has a naming conventions department! ISIS is also our creation — does exactly as told. So, Iraqi Kurds are given a slap — just to remind them whom they owe their "autonomy". But Syrian Kurds — loyal to Assad, and thus — dead and refugees. The press fawned over ISIS media savvy and internet smarts. Very impressive execution shots — just what was needed to raise the puls of western public that does not want more wars. Now, having not complained against this "menace" we created — we must congratulate neocons and accept our defeat. They are smarter then the rest of the population put togetner — as they know how to buy the loyalty of those we call "our" representatives. We can whine all we want. Smart we are not. When they are done with us, they will find another host to feed upon.
So, when one of our favored "moderate" rebel groups links up with an AQ cell, and later we decide to start bombing in Syria, they give the cell some new strange (Iranian sounding) name to conceptually and propagandistically separate that from our moderate allies. So the supposed moderates are not identified with the professional AQ imports they work with. Then it's bombs away.
Middle eastern politics and alliances are notoriously slippery, clan and regional based. Constantly evolving with new names and claimed identities, all part of the norm. Conspiracy thinking permeates the region though with the ever changing factional grouplets forming and allying, re-allying, such thinking is not entirely without basis.
But Obama and his friend insane John McCain can tell "our friends" from our enemies even when the locals can't and often don't really understand themselves.
Stalin used the same tactic, inventing or magnifying tiny dissident grouplets and giving them exotic names and colorful features, all to justify mass murder of alleged "wreckers" and mythical Trotskyite saboteurs. Keeps the masses pacified, knowing that the Boss is protecting them.
Khorasan is an intelligence term, I didn't think it was a secret that it's a US coined name.