The new NATO summit was supposed to be a celebration of the 13-year-long Afghan War, with officials planning to invite the newly inaugurated president to underscore some modicum of stability in the country. It didn’t work out that way.
Every election under the NATO occupation has been a complete disaster, but this summer’s presidential vote really took the cake, with the ballot stuffing in the runoff election giving way to months of audits, and eventually the withdrawal of Abdullah Abdullah, the presumed front-runner, when the election commission wouldn’t throw out enough ballots for his taste.
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen insisted NATO had achieved all of its goals in the war, and others also tried to put on a brave face of the “stronger” Afghanistan the occupation had produced, but unable to resolve a single election, few are buying it.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Trump Looking for Excuses to Withdraw From Iran Nuclear Deal - July 27th, 2017
- Saudi Blockade Prevents Fuel Aid Reaching Yemen - July 27th, 2017
- White House Sacks Top Iran Hawk Amid Ongoing Disagreements - July 27th, 2017
- Putin Aide: US Sanctions Could Severely Curb Russia's Economic Growth - July 27th, 2017
- US-Trained Iraqi Soldiers Committing War Crimes in Mosul - July 27th, 2017