The new NATO summit was supposed to be a celebration of the 13-year-long Afghan War, with officials planning to invite the newly inaugurated president to underscore some modicum of stability in the country. It didn’t work out that way.
Every election under the NATO occupation has been a complete disaster, but this summer’s presidential vote really took the cake, with the ballot stuffing in the runoff election giving way to months of audits, and eventually the withdrawal of Abdullah Abdullah, the presumed front-runner, when the election commission wouldn’t throw out enough ballots for his taste.
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen insisted NATO had achieved all of its goals in the war, and others also tried to put on a brave face of the “stronger” Afghanistan the occupation had produced, but unable to resolve a single election, few are buying it.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Report: US Airstrikes Killed 433 Civilians in Raqqa in August - September 20th, 2017
- 51 Countries Ratify UN Nuclear Weapons Ban - September 20th, 2017
- Russia Says 850 Nusra Fighters Killed in North Syria in 24 Hours - September 20th, 2017
- Spanish Police Step Up Catalonia Raids to Try to Block Referendum - September 20th, 2017
- US Allies Split on Trump's Threat to Destroy North Korea - September 20th, 2017