The new NATO summit was supposed to be a celebration of the 13-year-long Afghan War, with officials planning to invite the newly inaugurated president to underscore some modicum of stability in the country. It didn’t work out that way.
Every election under the NATO occupation has been a complete disaster, but this summer’s presidential vote really took the cake, with the ballot stuffing in the runoff election giving way to months of audits, and eventually the withdrawal of Abdullah Abdullah, the presumed front-runner, when the election commission wouldn’t throw out enough ballots for his taste.
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen insisted NATO had achieved all of its goals in the war, and others also tried to put on a brave face of the “stronger” Afghanistan the occupation had produced, but unable to resolve a single election, few are buying it.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Despite Assurances, Legality of Trump Nuclear Strike May Not Matter - November 22nd, 2017
- Israeli Forces Demolish Brand New Family Home in East Jerusalem - November 22nd, 2017
- East Ukraine in Turmoil Amid Claimed 'Coup' in Luhansk - November 22nd, 2017
- US Asked for Saudis to Ease Yemen Blockade - November 22nd, 2017
- Local Afghan Leaders Protest Deadly US Strikes on 'Heroin Labs' - November 22nd, 2017