President Obama announced today his intention to send 300 US special forces troops to Iraq as “advisers” to the Iraqi military. The deployment is above and beyond the nearly 300 US Marines also sent to the US Embassy in Baghdad.
While Obama tried to downplay the move, insisting that he remains determined not to send “American combat troops,” the nature of the advisory positions mean that the troops headed there will effectively be commanding Iraqi combat forces, and could easily get sucked into the fighting.
Sending “advisers” has long been a step toward more overt military involvement, with tiny amounts of US military advisers sent to Vietnam in 1950 by President Truman, with the number of troops and scope of the mission steadily rising for years until the US was in a huge war.
The slow crawl back into Iraq seems even more cynical, as President Obama has insisted he can send whatever troops he wants without Congressional support, and seems to be going slow primarily to pressure Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to resign.
Obama, cutting a Kennedy-esque figure. Can Bob McNamara be far behind?
Except Kennedy (and even, belatedly, McNamara) was learning from his terrible mistakes. Obama has learned to double down.
Absolutely correct. And he has yet to 'win' when he doubles down.
If Obama would would just cut aid to those "moderate rebels" who will be no match for ISIS when they get a foothold in Syria, then maybe he'll get a better view of who to drone…..that should include Maliki.
All that advancing by ISIS, all that capturing the Iraqi economic life line the Iraq largest refinery, all that capturing cities and etc, needed a military planing at least for last 3 months and these people have no military background unless they were handed information and hardware, I mean where the hell they got their hands on 100s of brand new Toyota trucks transporting them from cities to cites, they needed logistical equipment that only Turkey could have provided, the military information which could have been provided by USG, Jordanian military, Saudis and UAE forces. We knows that some of these mercenaries are trained by CIA in Jordan and some in Turkey with the knowledge of Erdogan government, we also know that the main supporter of ISIS are Turkish, Saudis hand in hand with Qatari tyrants regimes, we also know that Barack Hussein Obama have a special relation with these regime and from day one his policies been based on expending the Saudis religious territory from Libya into Syria and Iraq, but above all rewriting the new Sunni territorial map including entire Iraq. That is the only way for USG to get at Iran by expending Sunnis territory for later planed Iran war. And yes they started with Syria making it a proxy war to get into Iraq and later Iran.
Juan Cole was on Democracy Now yesterday. Cole said the U.S. needs to be careful or risk getting entangled in a new conflict in Iraq. Cole however also suggested air strikes like those employed successfully in Libya might be a better option. Amy Goodman did not challenge Cole who at times stumbled through the interview. I think Cole and other interventionists are beginning to realize how wrong they were.
We can only hope!
In 2002, I stated that despite the majority of the claims that the invasion (to come) of Iraq was about the oil, which it was to some degree, the real purpose was to destabilize the region and start a religious war between the Muslim factions, specifically the Shia and the Sunni. Almost all of the fighting currently in the region is along sectarians lines. One of the big mistakes was overthrowing the Sunni Baathist government of Saddam, in favor of the Shia government (dictatorship) of Maliki (and Iran.) The neocons wanted wall-to-wall fighting between the sects figuring that when the dust cleared they could waltz in and control the region – and the oil fields, of course.
The biggest mistake they made though was getting involved in the first place. Instigating a religious war guarantees there would be no winners and that the conflict would go on forever. The only way to end a religious war is to completely eradicate the religion and every one of it's followers – which is surely impossible to do.
The US should completely remove themselves from the region now and let the warring factions settle things themselves. They will reach a point where they realize that fighting amongst themselves is a no win situation and they will sit down and talk. Regardless, the US will have to bear the responsibility of having started this – and the repercussions, unfortunately.
Still, if Obama takes us back into Iraq, the American people should demand that he be impeached and tried for war crimes…and then go after Bushco.
You forget the MIC (military-industrial complex) that stands to make big bucks on the endless war between the Islamist hordes. THAT is the real reason the US invaded Afghan and Iraq and why we ISIS was funded by Saudi/Turkey/ Qatar, etc. Eisenhower warned us. Kennedy came to realize he was right and was trying to do something about it. MIC won THAT battle, didn't it? And it's had very little official opposition since. I wouldn't be surprised if Ford and Reagan were going to do something about it until their attempted assassinations.
Obama and his regime like the Republican regime are lawless. They don't adhere to the constitution anymore nor respect most of the laws they implement. They do not work for we the people; they are a corrupt oligarch and a dangerous one.
israel first to announce the de facto partition of Iraq? job done.
Kurdish advances
Iraq is now divided on a de facto basis into a Shi’ite south and center, including Baghdad, a Sunni, ISIS-dominated west and a Kurdish-ruled north…
The biggest winners from this situation, apart perhaps from ISIS itself, are the Iraqi Kurds…
Iraq is now divided on a de facto basis into a Shi’ite south and center, including Baghdad, a Sunni, ISIS-dominated west and a Kurdish-ruled north…
*Largely ignored by the Western media, the Kurds have been quietly building their autonomy in the three northern provinces of Erbil, Sulaymaniyah and Dohuk, granted to them by the Iraqi Constitution of 2005… http://www.jpost.com/Features/Front-Lines/Kurdish…
*also largely ignored has been the first part of what Thierry Meyssan, in his "Washington Relaunches its Iraq Partition Project", describes as "The Peshmerga and ISIL offensive".
job well done, indeed. israel just received its first shipment –
Israel receives first ever oil shipment from Iraqi Kurdistan
The SCF Altai tanker was anchored near Ashkelon port early on Friday morning, ship tracking and industry sources said.
A tanker delivered a cargo of disputed crude oil from Iraqi Kurdistan's new pipeline for the first time on Friday in Israel, despite threats by Baghdad to take legal action against any buyer…
But the new export route to the Turkish port of Ceyhan, designed to bypass Baghdad's federal pipeline system, has created a bitter dispute over oil sale rights between the central government and the Kurds…
The United States, Israel's closest ally, does not support independent oil sales by the Kurdish region and has warned possible buyers against accepting the cargoes… http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Israe…
It's 'deja vu all over again'.