The tiny Adriatic nation was pushed to accept the plan by the US, which cited it having destroyed its own relatively small chemical arsenal recently. Albanian officials insisted that they don’t have the technology nor the capacity to handle the huge Syrian arsenal, however.
Finishing the disarmament inside Syria seems extremely unlikely, with the nation embroiled in an ever-worsening civil war, but attempts to con someone else into taking on 1,000+ tons of chemicals have so far failed, with Albanian joining Norway and Lebanon in spurning such calls.
Some are worrying that this could derail the disarmament plans entirely, but the OPCW, which is overseeing the disarmament, insists that the US and Russia have “alternatives” to these hosts. It seems their preference is to throw the arms at some smallish, neutral nation, but that doesn’t mean it’s the only choice.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Trump Officials Trying to Finalize Legal Language to Expand Gitmo's Use - August 20th, 2017
- White House Continues to Talk Up 'Preventative War' Against North Korea - August 20th, 2017
- Trump Elevates US Cyber Command to a Formal Military Command - August 20th, 2017
- Abbas: After 20 Meetings I Still Don't Understand Trump's Peace Plan - August 20th, 2017
- Lebanon's Army Advances Deep Into ISIS-Held Border Territory - August 20th, 2017