Struggles coping with corruption in Afghanistan reconstruction contracts have been an issue from virtually the moment the NATO occupation began, but with a drawdown planned in 2015 and growing public opposition to the war, NATO members are rethinking their “enduring presence.”
Initially the plan was to focus the military presence in 2015 and beyond on trainers to keep building up the struggling Afghan military, which is facing double digit desertion rates and constantly replacing them with raw, poorly paid recruits.
Instead of wasting their time and money training Afghan troops who by-and-large are going to desert almost immediately thereafter anyhow, many nations see the real value in the occupation as keeping an eye on the billions of dollars in aid they intend to keep throwing into the black hole that is Afghan contractors.
The numbers for the nations are staying about the same, but with less and less trainers and more and more “managers” meant to oversee the aid dollars. Whether they will be any more effective at keeping track of the money than their predecessors remains to be seen.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Trump Wants High-Profile Meeting With Putin at G20 Summit - June 26th, 2017
- House Spending Bill Threatens to Suspend Nuclear Treaty With Russia - June 26th, 2017
- Bahrain Accuses Qatar of Seeking 'Military Escalation' - June 26th, 2017
- White House Appears to Be Planning Attack on Assad - June 26th, 2017
- Top Senator Blocks Gulf Arms Sales Over Qatar Crisis - June 26th, 2017