The US-Russia pact on Syria was seemingly a done deal, pushing Syria on a speed-up above and beyond the requirements of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), but giving up on US demands for a “military option.”
That deal seems to be in serious risk now, as France is pushing for attacking Syria and the US and Britain are no longer saying that they will accept a UN resolution based on what the US and Russia agreed to last week.
Russia says they won’t support any resolution authorizing use of force against Syria, and that means there could be an indefinite delay on any UN resolution, even though Syria ratified the CWC days ago.
France seems to be the driving force against the deal, and that decision seems to be in no small part based on the Hollande government’s desperation to assert itself as a world power, even if it means starting an unnecessary war in one of their former colonial possessions.
I wonder if Paris were nuked Hollande would be so gung ho.
In fact – today any country in the world needs nukes – otherwise they are bombed to stone age or get their ordered "up-rise" or "civil war". Search for OTPOR the US revolution making company at http://08oo.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/key-reasons-…
Even having chemical weapons, as Syria are not sufficient when no carrier missiles are available or no available terror networks to plant poison gas in New York.
This is the political message, NATO countries are sending to all leaders of the world.
I guess the world will understand this after Leaders in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya Sudan, Mali, Jemen etc. killed by US agents.
There is no democracy in USA nor in its policies toward other nations, what is left for a militarism regime-USG is its military, remember these words: "what is so good about this mighty army if we can not use it." Ms. secretary over a million children are dead in Iraq because of the sanction. "Is worth the price"' Madeline Albright in regard to Balkan and iraq war. Syria is just another war for USG and its militarism complex, if a million more of a Arab nation, Assyrian nation, Kurdish nation, Syrian nation, Iranian nation and etc are killed by this complex, is worth the price for USA, but for nations that are devastated, USA never cared about, why should they care now.
Democracy is just the cover of an capitalist world elite who rules the world.
Correction: capitalist that wants to rule the world. If they were ruling the world we wouldn't have all that wars where people and governments resisting USGEU capitalism and militarism regimes.
Might've been predictable (but I didn't predict it). http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/12/us-syria-crisi... The report could easily become a bargaining chip in talks between Moscow and Western powers on conditions for Syria to give up its chemical weapons and the terms of a United Nations Security Council resolution on the matter. [..] Two Western diplomats said they strongly expected chief U.N. investigator Ake Sellstrom's report would confirm the U.S. view that sarin gas was used in the attack on suburbs of Damascus that killed hundreds. So that there was an event that could've been anticipated to change the game meant parties looked for a way for it to change in their favor: USUKFrael wants it to 'confirm' it's broadcasted fantasy. If I'm right that the UN report is the triggering event here(?), then it doesn't matter at all what it reveals in reality, it only matters to them that an impression can be made that it confirms their fantasy. That's achieved by abruptly ceasing some of it's cooperation; that's all the signal a true authoritarian (congenital GWoT-Sucker) needs.
Manipulating public perception through false flags, provocations, and deliberate "misinterpretations" of vaguely worded and obscure documents that most people are too stupid to understand anyway – that's a well established modus operandi for the warmongers.
…worth specifically mentioning behave-as-if as a tactic. In that way one 'allows' (facilitates) false conclusions more so than one is accountable as a source of pop conclusions, and it's probably more effective than flat lies.
…though deliberate misinterpretation might subsume behave-as-if.
I read my comment over…i should clarify that by 'event' I meant the report's release.
I'm sure that France is happy to play "bad cop" in conjunction with the US "good cop" role, thereby (with secret US agreement) subverting the deal that the US made with Russia (and Syria).
No doubt France is depending on the US doing the bulk of the bombing. Bet they would just have a token force and cheerlead from the sidelines (as Israel always does). Easy for them to talk tough when they don't have the ability to back it up. This is why it is more important than ever for the US House to vote to stop Obama/Kerry once and for all. Doesn't look like they have the political will to do so, however. They'd rather have their many vacations and waste all their time conducting meaningless votes to stop Obamacare.
> antiwar is pro war selling themselves as antiwar to fool us-se
Yeah well F.U. too
It's not nice to lie about Antiwar.com. Buh-bye.
Typical American 'negotiating' over the last 15 years or so. That is, to kill any potential deal by constantly asking for more, more, more. Hitler used exactly the same techniques in the 1930's to lead to his invasions of the countries around him. This is how you negotiate when you don't want a deal, but instead only want the negotiations to fail and lead to a war.
This is why all Americans need to call their members of Congress again and insist that a vote be held in both houses of Congress to authorize an attack against Syria. A roll call vote would put them all on record for the 2014 elections and beyond. A certain crushing defeat against war would also send a message to Obama and his war monger buddies to STFU with their constant threats of an attack.
Hollande becomes the new Tony Blair. Here we go again and this time igt is all the way to Iran.But the American people will not stand for it and be ready for trouble at home as well as abroad.
we'll see…the American people have a very bad track record of getting what they want from the government.
It isn’t clear to me why a UNSC resolution is even needed. Does the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, (OPCW), which oversees the Chemical Weapons Convention, lack authority to supervise the disarmament without such a resolution? Even if so, what would stop Syria and Russia from proceeding on their own leaving the West looking like children who refuse to play if not allowed their own ball? I’m not a lawyer or a diplomat so I would really like to know.
Now why do I get the feeling Bibi and his fellow miscreants have a hand in this somewhere?
Another idea, which may or may not be true:
http://thenewsdoctors.com/why-sryia-its-not-what-…
Fair is fair, if the Western powers get to collateral bomb Syrian babies if Assad runs into bad luck, then babies on a U.S. military base called Israel shall get the same treatment if the West is up to their normal deceitful tricks.