Obama to Inform Netanyahu of Plans for Summer Iran War
Will Urge Israel to 'Sit Tight' And Let US Start War
According to unnamed officials quoted by Israel’s Channel 10, President Obama is planning to inform Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of his intention to attack Iran this summer, with June beginning the “window of opportunity” for his next war.
Secretary of State John Kerry said in a press conference earlier today that time is “running out” for diplomacy, and it seems that the next P5+1 talks are being set up as the “last chance” for Iran to give in to assorted US demands before being attacked.
President Obama will reportedly inform Israel of this decision during his upcoming visit next month, and will ask Netanyahu to “sit tight” and stop talking up the war for a few months until the US can get it off the ground unilaterally.
The US has been setting the stage for a June war since last year, when Obama had likewise reassured Israel in the lead-up to elections that a US war would be launched by June 2013, an effort to keep Israel from starting the war ahead of the US vote.
It should be noted that a June war would be extremely problematic on a number of levels, including Iran having a June 14 presidential election to replace outgoing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Moreover, previous reports of a “war date” being set by the administration have not panned out.
Netanyahu has been making much of the “red line” of Iran’s civilian enrichment program growing more efficient, despite the UN confirming that Iran keeps diverting the civilian uranium to civilian uses and the stockpile is not getting considerably larger than its been. He has presented summer as a likely time to start a war, and any US pledge might be designed more to placate him than around any intention to actually go through with it.
Most of Iran’s uranium is enriched to 3.5 percent, for the Bushehr electricity plant, while a small fraction is further enriched to 20 percent, the level needed for the US-built Tehran Research Reactor, which makes medical isotopes.
Indeed, US intelligence agencies have repeatedly conceded in “threat assessments” that Iran’s program is purely civilian and that there is “no decision” by Iran to even attempt to make a nuclear weapon. A recent poll has shown that an overwhelming majority of Americans have been convinced by politicians that Iran’s program is a “threat” to American interests, though polls have generally shown a strong opposition to starting a war over the matter.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- 12 Chechen Fighters Killed in Central Syria - May 24th, 2013
- Syrian Rebel Unity Talks on Brink of Collapse - May 24th, 2013
- New US Embassy Guards to Cost $1.6 Million Each - May 24th, 2013
- Constant Mortar Fire as Sectarian Violence Continues in North Lebanon - May 24th, 2013
- Obama's Drone Limits Welcomed in Pakistan, If They Pan Out - May 24th, 2013





Base
February 25th, 2013 at 4:23 pm
I dont believe this for one second. Obama has no appetite for a war with Iran.
mojo
February 25th, 2013 at 4:45 pm
There are two kind of regimes that would love for this war starts sooner the later.., Israel apartheid-rasist regime and USA vulture capitalism. But off course.., Hollywood Neo liberal fascism will do the advertising by all means for this war to start.
Seldon
February 25th, 2013 at 4:49 pm
This has been "unofficially" officially said for at least a year now, and probably for closer to two years now. And, America's "diplomacy" has been driving in this direction all along, with their constant raising of demands every time Iran seems ready to compromise and make a deal.
Both were well known before the election, so everyone who voted for Obama voted in favor of this war. Hope you like (more) blood on your hands.
James
February 25th, 2013 at 5:48 pm
I agree. Look at the source: unnamed Israeli officials. This pretty much guarantees there won't be a "unilateral war" in June.
Chris Condon
February 25th, 2013 at 6:09 pm
I quite agree. I'm no fan of Obama and I did not vote for him either time he ran. But I just don't see him getting us into a war with Iran.
Andrewp111
February 25th, 2013 at 6:18 pm
Israel has to do their own war. Obama won't. And Israel probably won't nuke Iran either, since they want the USA to do it and take all the risks. So nothing will happen to Iran. But Iran will fight Israel in Syria and Lebanon. Oh wait, they already are…. That is where the war is. Look for expansion of the Islamic Civil War already underway in Syria and Lebanon to the entire region.
Andrewp111
February 25th, 2013 at 6:18 pm
Israel has to do their own war. Obama won't. And Israel probably won't nuke Iran either, since they want the USA to do it and take all the risks. So nothing will happen to Iran. But Iran will fight Israel in Syria and Lebanon. Oh wait, they already are…. That is where the war is. Look for expansion of the Islamic Civil War already underway in Syria and Lebanon to the entire region.
baz
February 25th, 2013 at 6:39 pm
THose who dont believe this are spot on… This is not going to happen. If there is going to be a war with Iran, it will not be so plainly initiated by the US. There is too much to lose that way. It must be Iran who appears to be the provocateur. If there is going to be a war with Iran, US public opinion must be squarely pro war…..in order for that to happen, there must be a 9/11 type attack against the US that can be blamed on iran and beat the war drums for an attack
mark g.
February 25th, 2013 at 8:18 pm
If Obama attacks Iran then, like Bush Jr., he should hang. But I suspect that this war talk is designed to simply terrorize the Iranians into stopping their development of nuclear power.
But one thing is certain: the Israelis are all over this latest pronouncement and ongoing campaign of intimidation..
byrd_bahls22
February 25th, 2013 at 8:38 pm
Iran has done what ? When ? To whom ? I got through my day without any harm from Iran.
Roger Lafontaine
February 25th, 2013 at 8:41 pm
The Israelis and their (p)sychophants have been begging for this and brainwashing us with their Hollywood-Washington propaganda for years. I think they really believe their own glorified delusions. Reality will have some harsh lessons if they pursue this. Everybody will suffer. Israel will be shattered and America will tremble in fear. I predict.
Rico
February 25th, 2013 at 8:55 pm
After the Iraq, Afghanistan fiasco I do not think peace nobel winner and laureate Obama will take on Iran. On the contrary a nuclear Iran will add balance to the middle east since it is a known fact that Israel has nuclear weapons of its own. Israel has used chemical weapons such as white phosphorous and other weapons of mass destruction such as uranium enriched missiles on civilian populations. All this has been documented by the UN on the Goldstone report. Israel is a derelict state in constant contempt of international laws and basic human rights.
Jim Smith
February 25th, 2013 at 9:09 pm
Why does Israel have to do any war? Oh wait, because they are expanding illegal settlements as a way of ultimately kicking the Palestinians out of their homeland. Gotchya.
Johnny in Wi.
February 25th, 2013 at 9:22 pm
Seldon: I agree with your comments. That is the way we are headed. I hope we are both wrong and these other birds are right. Anyone who voted for Obama voted for a died in the wool mass murderer of women and children in the thousands. Romney was only a potential mass murderer. although he did sound like he wanted to be one, that is for sure.
Peter
February 25th, 2013 at 9:24 pm
And the new propaganda movie (Hollywood production "Argo") is the medial preparation for more hatred against Iran.
mogamboguru
February 26th, 2013 at 1:15 am
You know someone from Israel's inner circle of government attempts to utter a lie when he opens his – or her's; Kudos to Szipi Livni – mouth and moves his/her lips.
The good thing about these constantly flowing threats of war against Iran is that anyone and everyone who would attack Iran about their non-existing "nookular" threat perfectly qualifies as a war criminal unter the regulations of the UN-Charta.
I'd love to see Netanyahu hunker down in his bunker with nowhere to go but his own toilet without fear of being detained and sentenced to life.
Let's call it "Downfall redux".
Yonatan
February 26th, 2013 at 1:23 am
They are continuing in their attempt to box him in. Unfortunately he is a 'go along to get along' type (the most favorable interpretation). These war mongers need to be shown the door.
Augustbrhm
February 26th, 2013 at 1:55 am
What is the head of the UN doing hiding under the bed when america/israel threaten war against Iran does he not know it is a crime.
MoT
February 26th, 2013 at 2:10 am
Who in the hell are these so-called "polls" asking to answer these questions? I'm suspicious of anything that uses such methodology to push for war.
paulBass
February 26th, 2013 at 2:39 am
so why is obama going to israel?
assuming the worst with obama has so far be the correct way of thinking.
unless you think obama is going to demand a settlement freeze and an end to the blockade of gaza, there does not seem to be any reason for obama to go.
paulBass
February 26th, 2013 at 2:39 am
so why is obama going to israel?
assuming the worst with obama has so far been the correct way of thinking.
unless you think obama is going to demand a settlement freeze and an end to the blockade of gaza, there does not seem to be any reason for obama to go.
jinx77
February 26th, 2013 at 4:41 am
basically they are they are trying to corner him into the the aggression..
ever thing I have read else where says obama kerry and hagel have no intention of starting another war
Teri
February 26th, 2013 at 5:51 am
Get ready, this Murderer has no boundaries . He's tasted the BLOOD of Arabs in the thousands.
Everyday he murders innocent civilians in the Middle East and gives Israel the green light to kill
and steal Palestinian land. What makes you think he would pass up another opportunity to use his
power for more killing?. Why do you think Iranians want nukes? This president has "no moral
center".
NoMoreWars
February 26th, 2013 at 6:13 am
Unofficially said for "1 year." Are you kidding me? America has been talking about attacking Iran for at least the past 8 years. And almost everyday at that.
keltrava
February 26th, 2013 at 6:18 am
If this report is true then Obama neeeds to be impeached immediately and brought to justice.
At least an investigations needs to launched.
conumishu
February 26th, 2013 at 7:16 am
True. Nevertheless, when Kerry was running against Bush II, when asked specifically about Iran he was more hawkish than Bush and, what worried me most, he didn't exclude using atomic weapons. As secretary of state the role is different and rhetoric is more useful in electoral campaigns but I wonder why did Obama pick him? Chuck Hagen, after all, is only secretary of defense, if Obama starts the war he will have to follow orders or resign, but he's a less active part on the possible path to war than Kerry.
peter vojta
February 26th, 2013 at 7:25 am
We could be all wrong, I agree the is no US appetite to war…..But, Big But, there are Banksters always behind, there is dying US dollar, its position as reserve currency…
Zionist banksters did not stop either first or second WW, opposite is truth…
Lets hope there will be no war….lets hope "sanity and reason" togheter with awaiken Mankind will be victorious, lets hope World will turn against THE ONLY EVIL IDEOLOGY – Zionism and place in Palestine called Israel….peter czech
james
February 26th, 2013 at 7:39 am
No, Obama is going there on his first foreign visit after his inauguration for the second term to thank his masters in the sh*tty little state. Grovel a bit, assure them that Hagel will be a good dog and, as always and without fail, accuse the Palestinians of breathing.
mogamboguru
February 26th, 2013 at 7:42 am
Maybe there's a grand bargain between Israel and the USA in the making?
Obama: "If you oust Assad and help the FSA conquer Syria for me, I'll mop up Iran for you!"
Netanyahu: "Deal!"
rwe2late
February 26th, 2013 at 8:17 am
J in Wi.
There were other candidates, at least one of whom was clearly anti-war
(purportedly the raison d'etre of this website)
Lou Cypherr
February 26th, 2013 at 8:33 am
Islamic civil war? A very incorrect statement to say the least. It is a proxy war. The FSA (or "rebels") are nothing but a front to cover for actual terrorists/mercenaries sent there from all over the region; funded and armed by the US, Israel, and a handful of allies.
The bombings, executions, and wholesale murder of Syrian people is not the work of the Syrian government; but the work of the imported terrorists (aka "rebels") aiming to blame Assad for it all and shift public opinion and force Assad out.
There will likely be no war in June. Unless that boil on the arse of humanity known as Israel has a deathwish and starts it themselves, in which case, PROBLEM SOLVED.
rwe2late
February 26th, 2013 at 8:59 am
Have you people ever heard of “false flag”?
The US empire under Obama is not going to commit crimes blatantly.
Obama has already chosen to escalate the current level of US-led aggression,
with even MORE US-led aggression. (Africa, drones, cyber-war, etc. … anyone notice?)
There will be incident(s), likely false flag or less likely real but cleverly provoked against Iran,
and the Obamaphiles will fully support the blood-spilling,
just as they have supported all his frauds and murders.
They will surely repeat once again, others are to blame, he was pushed into a corner,
his intentions are good, he had to be “realistic”, no others could do better.
Heathcliff_Maw
February 26th, 2013 at 9:09 am
We've been getting these warnings of imminent war with Iran since Bush's second term. This seems to be one more attempt by Israelis to scare Iran into some sort of concessions.
Umm Abdullah
February 26th, 2013 at 10:19 am
I was skeptical, too, and glad to see all the comments saying the same thing. There was some fear of Netanyahu pressuring Obama during the presidential campaign, but now that he's safely into his second term and doesn't have to worry about getting re-elected, why would he do it this summer? From all accounts, he's not a big fan of Netanyahu's. All of the sources for this report were either the Times of Israel or antiwar.com…
Bill Lee
February 26th, 2013 at 10:26 am
Third last paragraph is correct: any yap is to placate Netanyahu; there will be no US attack on Iran.
The zio can take their bribe money to their Swiss bank accounts for the next ten years, but their regime is doomed.
Evan Wentz
February 26th, 2013 at 10:40 am
And plenty of medals to go around to the brave men and women who press the buttons to make it happen!
Duglarri
February 26th, 2013 at 10:56 am
I’ll believe in a war against Iran as soon as someone can demonstrate how the United States can win it.
Wars are about objectives. If you meet your objectives, you win. Iran: stop enrichment? Can’t be done short of permanent, non-stop bombing. Damage Fordo (if that can be done) and it’ll just be rebuilt. Regime change? Not possible without invasion, and invasion is not possible.
So when the uniforms are briefing Obama, what do they tell him? “Best case scenario, we will not meet our objectives; worst case scenario, we lose a carrier task group?” In other words, the best the United States can do in a war with Iran is lose?
Contrast that with Iraq, where the Pentagon was able to tell Bush: two weeks, tops. No problems.
This time: “all the war games and simulations have us losing this war.”
Much as they look forward to wars, military officers don’t get promoted for losing them. I just don’t see how that briefing goes.
Jeff
February 26th, 2013 at 10:58 am
What is missing here is that China, and Russia have warned they will not stand by for any unilateral war on Iran. Both of these countries would hand the US, and Israel their arse. Plus Iran already has state of the art long range Chinese missiles. I am looking forward to the day when the IDF are beaten, maimed, and executed in mass numbers since they are nothing more than cold blooded terrorists. Come to Tehran Uncle Sam, because this will be your last war…
patriothere
February 26th, 2013 at 11:18 am
Not credible at all. Obama is just trying to allay their fears so they don't do anything.
Gordon
February 26th, 2013 at 12:06 pm
The announcement is blatant propaganda nonsense.. especially with a headline like that. It has no other purpose than to intimidate the Iranians into accepting the US's pathetic 'offer' at the P+1 talks currently underway.
Rather disturbingly, antiwar.com hasn't pointed this out… and we have to wonder why antiwar.com feels obliged to take part in the US's intimidation tactics.
richard vajs
February 26th, 2013 at 12:09 pm
Good for you, Jeff for mentioning that Russia and China has have some say in this – Netanyahu and Obama can hold hands in the moonlight and whisper sweet nothings in each other's ears all they want, but come daylight, America and Israel both know (or will be told) that the World will not tolerate an attack upon Iran which could easily trigger WWIII – just so that a–hole "settlers" can steal more land.
Thomas L. Knapp
February 26th, 2013 at 1:45 pm
"we have to wonder why antiwar.com doesn't feel obliged to report my opinion as fact."
There, fixed that for ya.
Gordon
February 26th, 2013 at 2:02 pm
I'll do my own fixing…
In the meantime you work on fixing your ignorance…
Carlos
February 26th, 2013 at 2:07 pm
Obama nazi!!!
Vendetta
February 26th, 2013 at 2:52 pm
That's funny, I actually felt more sympathetic to Iran's people after watching Argo.
PEACE EVER AFTER
February 26th, 2013 at 3:03 pm
I am sure the Mossad is working on that right now. Hard as it is they will try to put the blame on Iran. Maybe sinking one of our ships in tht Gulf and killing a few hundred sailors will do the trick. Remember the USS Main.
PEACE EVER AFTER
February 26th, 2013 at 3:05 pm
Exactly right.
mulegino
February 26th, 2013 at 3:53 pm
Our naval personnel would be wise to remember the words of the poet (with a twist):
"Timeo Israelis et dona ferentes".
Remember the USS Liberty!
Jaime
February 26th, 2013 at 6:20 pm
Rather than the door, they should be shown the gallows.
baz
February 26th, 2013 at 6:52 pm
i think it would be much more effective if americans were to die on american soil per 9/11. either that or a plane going down would do the trick
baz
February 26th, 2013 at 6:55 pm
Argo was planned and produced specifically as part of the anti-iran campaign to bring about the bad memories and feelings of anger among boomers about iran that they felt during the "hostage" crisis. It had been marked to "win" the oscar from the day it first started production by the powers that control hollywood. If you wanted any more proof that the oscars are rigged, then ask why a third rate movie with a third rate director was able to win such an acclaimed prize?
asynge
February 26th, 2013 at 11:19 pm
I explained the probable reason for Ditz's 'mistake'. The comment was not off topic, But was removed.
asynge
February 27th, 2013 at 3:12 pm
Knapp is not new to that particular game
iranlikesfreedom
February 28th, 2013 at 6:13 am
Sounds like all above comments were written by one person. Let me guess: the author?