US Blocks UN Resolution Condemning Damascus Bombing
UN Envoy Issues Personal Statement Calling Attack a 'War Crime'
Yesterday’s massive bombing attack near the Ba’ath Party headquarters in Damascus, an attack which left 100 people dead and 250 others wounded, the vast majority civilians, was a “war crime,” according to UN Special Envoy Lakhdar Brahimi.
In a personal statement, Brahimi said that “nothing could justify such horrible actions that amount to war crimes under international law,” and said that he “strongly condemns” the attack.
Brahimi’s personal statement is going to be the closest we get to a UN condemnation of the killings, however, as the US has blocked a Russian resolution from moving through the UN Security Council condemning the attack.
The US denied being opposed to a resolution as such but wanted an alternative resolution that focused on condemnations of the Syrian government, while mentioning the bombing as a secondary concern. They went on to accuse Russia of blocking that statement, even though it mentioned the bombing in passing, and insisted that was the real opposition to the condemnation.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- US Slams Russia's Missile Sales to Syria - May 17th, 2013
- Nine Killed, 70 Wounded in Bombings Near Kandahar - May 17th, 2013
- Envoy: Russia May Deploy Troops to Tajik-Afghan Border - May 17th, 2013
- Pentagon in Afghan Budget Crisis, Seeks to Shift $10 Billion in Funds - May 17th, 2013
- Nigeria Launching Massive Offensive Against Boko Haram - May 17th, 2013





mojo
February 22nd, 2013 at 10:39 pm
The us government will never support terrorism.., is just that they vote against those who will and want to stop the us double moral and double language in many occasion at the united nation.
mojo
February 22nd, 2013 at 10:39 pm
The us government will never support terrorism.., is just that they vote against those who will and want to stop the us double moral and double language in many occasion at the united nation.
MoT
February 22nd, 2013 at 11:45 pm
What the hell. Uncle Sam has the nerve to block mentioning what their hand maidens are up to but still wants to point it's blood soaked fingers at Assad and have him condemned. Hypocrisy in spades baby!
Yonatan
February 23rd, 2013 at 12:02 am
Why would anyone expect the US to condemn its terrorist proxies?
james
February 23rd, 2013 at 3:12 am
George "they hate us for our freedom" Bush
Mike
February 23rd, 2013 at 3:25 am
The US is up TO ITS NECK IN BLOOD–WORLWIDE..
Georgeg
February 23rd, 2013 at 5:50 am
Are we for real??…..
Mark
February 23rd, 2013 at 6:01 am
Imagine that a bomb attack in Israel leaves 100 people dead, 250 others wounded, and Russia refuses to condemn the attack unless an alternative resolution is offered that condemns the Israeli government for its terroristic actions against the Palestinians in Gaza. Would the world side with Russia? Of course not.
And why would the United States condemn the very same terrorists recognized as the legitimate government of Syria? The very same terrorists armed by allies of the United States, if not the U.S. itself?
jinx77
February 23rd, 2013 at 6:08 am
the us/israel together in their utter hate for the arab/muslim world….
one day folks …these two will get it handed to them
skulz fontaine
February 23rd, 2013 at 6:40 am
The UNSC serves what purpose? Diplomania at it's finest. Oh yeah…
skulz fontaine
February 23rd, 2013 at 6:40 am
The UNSC serves what purpose? Diplomania at it's finest. Oh yeah…
CanuckBC
February 23rd, 2013 at 11:59 am
At least the world can see in full view what is US up to in Syria. But it does not change a thing, I know, since they have been blocking all resolution against Israel for decades. At least they will not be able to complain when Syrian "freedom fighters" turn their attention yo Israel and the west. And as they are jihadists they certainly will. They are already blaming US for lack of support in their jihad.
Mark
February 23rd, 2013 at 4:07 pm
The U.S. will never support terrorism? Did you mean to write, "The U.S. will never stop supporting terrorism"? How about the MEK terrorists of Iran; the KLA terrorists of Kosovo; the LIFG terrorists of Libya . . . ? Drink more Kool Aid and develop a more credible fantasy.
Augustbrhm
February 23rd, 2013 at 4:13 pm
That`s the great "Satan" for you.
Bill Lee
February 23rd, 2013 at 9:45 pm
Of course the psychopathic trash of the US regime blocked condemnation of terrorism.
Augustbrhm
February 24th, 2013 at 1:26 am
A very sick country with a very sick government.
nomange
February 24th, 2013 at 5:39 am
It's not just the bombing but now the de facto annexation of the Golan Heights and approval of oil drilling by Genie Energy Israel, a company connected to Dick Cheney- i.e., more blatant theft and plunder. Israel's not a country to do business with if you can help it. And the U.S. is not much of a "world's policeman". The parent Genie company is based in New Jersey and is also involved in oil shale fracking in Colorado.
Larry
February 24th, 2013 at 9:51 am
What?
The great expert on Syria apparently who knows nothing about Syria. And nothing about grammar.
RobertB
February 24th, 2013 at 4:42 pm
Leave out the 'who'.
And just stop it.
RobertB
February 24th, 2013 at 4:46 pm
A war crime cannot be committed by terrorists; it is not a war. A war crime is committed by states, in a declared war (not that anyone bothers with the formality of declaring war anymore).
james
February 25th, 2013 at 1:55 am
And very sick people.