Western calls to install a “UN peacekeeping force” in Syria have been shot down by the Russian Foreign Ministry, which noted that there is no peace for them to keep in the middle of a civil war.
Calls for UN action have been common enough, but other than a brief period when UN monitors were deployed to monitor a ceasefire, only to be withdrawn when rebels disavowed the ceasefire, the UN has not deployed into the country.
The idea that the UN could impose an end to fighting is implausible, as Western estimates for their own occupations have suggested it would take an enormous number of troops to conquer Syria, let alone do so while fighting both regime and rebels. The UN simply doesn’t have the troops.
Russian officials say that the effort to approve some sort of UN force is simply an effort to get something through the UN that NATO can use as justification for their own invasion. This has meant most UN Security Council resolutions have been vetoed by Russia as too vague, or vetoed by NATO members for being not vague enough.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- South Korea's Moon Ratifies Recent North Korea Deals - October 23rd, 2018
- Pence Won't Rule Out Nukes in Space - October 23rd, 2018
- Syrian Observatory: US Has Killed Over 3,000 Civilians in Syria Since 2014 - October 23rd, 2018
- Bolton: US Plans Talks With Allies Before Leaving Nuclear Pact - October 23rd, 2018
- Bolton Rejects Russian Call to Stay in Nuclear Treaty - October 23rd, 2018