Gaza’s ‘Long-Range Rockets’ Just Regular Rockets Without Explosives
Take Off the Warhead and the Empty Barrel Flies Further, Officials Note
Much has been made of the “threat” posed by the seemingly longer-range rockets fired out of the Gaza Strip. Since the Israeli invasion the regular, barely explosive rockets that hit southern towns that even most Israelis aren’t that familiar with have been replaced by the menace of rockets hitting noteworthy places like Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.
Is this the smoking gun proving some nation is helping Gaza factions with rocket technology? Not at all, it turns out, as the rockets flying so much farther are the exact same metal tubes that tend to come out of the strip whenever Israel attacks, and the reason they are going further is that they took all the explosives and the warhead casing off.
“They’re pipes, basically,” one Israeli official noted. And while the flying chunks of cylindrical metal could conceivably clonk someone on the head, the menace posed by such devices is even more theoretical than the already marginal risk posed by Gaza’s usual retaliatory strikes.
Some Palestinian factions are denying this, insisting that it is all an Israeli plot to try to make their attacks seem less dangerous. Yet with the “long-range” fire seemingly not doing anything, the reports seem credible.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Israel Demands French TV Retract 2000 Report on Gaza Child's Killing - May 19th, 2013
- Netanyahu Threatens More Attacks on Syria - May 19th, 2013
- Karzai Heads to India to Seek More Military Aid - May 19th, 2013
- Taliban Kill 10 Police as Latest Surge of Afghan Violence Continues - May 19th, 2013
- Pakistan Officials: Army No Threat to New Govt - May 19th, 2013





popsiq
November 19th, 2012 at 6:52 am
Oi vey! Think of the expense! How much does it cost to drop a flying pipe with an AAMRAAM even it it is 'home made'?
John_Muhammad
November 19th, 2012 at 8:37 am
Hmmm… usually, two interceptors are fired from an Iron Dome battery for each incoming missile; at $90,000 per interceptor that's quite a hefty price tag, considering there have been a few hundred outbound rocket from Gaza this round. Now, if those Gazan rockets ARE unarmed, we're talking a very low unit cost for each one and just the cost disparity is enormous.
I wonder how Joe Sixpack would react if he knew the US budget for 2013 included 210 billion dollars to pay for Israel's Iron Dome System when Israel itself was providing only 1 or 2 million itself, and that only in the testing stages.
Joe Sixpack
November 19th, 2012 at 9:48 am
US budget for 2013 included 210 billion dollars to pay for Israel's Iron Dome System. Source?
Watson
November 19th, 2012 at 12:51 pm
This is the best I can find. Still, way too much taxpayers' money.
House Report 112-479 – NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013
SECTION 227–IRON DOME SHORT-RANGE ROCKET DEFENSE PROGRAM http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&sid=c…
Ben
November 20th, 2012 at 11:38 am
If this is true than how is it 11 Israelites have been killed?
Anton
November 22nd, 2012 at 4:28 pm
"US budget for 2013 included 210 billion dollars to pay for Israel's Iron Dome SystemI "
John. Where did you get that number? I understand you wrote that probably sitting in a basement and under Israeli's air strikes, but perhaps since there is ceasefire, you could provide a link?. LOL.
charles
November 22nd, 2012 at 4:32 pm
"US budget for 2013 included 210 billion dollars to pay for Israel's Iron Dome System "
John. Where did you get that number? I understand you wrote that probably sitting in a basement and under Israeli's air strikes, but perhaps since there is ceasefire, you could provide a link?. LOL.