With a flurry of angry condemnations from political rivals surround recent leaks on President Obama’s use of mass assassinations and cyberattacks, Obama is angrily condemning the idea that the White House would ever release classified documents for its own benefit, saying that was an “offensive” notion.
Obama went on to say that leaking documents to the media was a “criminal act” and promised a broad probe into the leaks. The feigned outrage and the promised probe are nothing new in American presidential history, however.
Indeed, one need only go back to the last administration, with I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby’s leak of Valerie Plame’s identity coming with direct administration approval and for direct political gain: in that case to make the case for the president’s Iraq war ambitions.
It isn’t exclusively a modern occurrence either. Rather, every administration has had its promise to “probe” a leak for the past 150 years, railing at leaks that stood to damage them politically and furiously denying involvement in the ones aimed at making them look better.
History isn’t on the side of the probe either, for while some of the probes have ended with convictions of illegal leaking, many of them have simply collapsed after a few months, once they are safely out of the public limelight.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Trump Wants High-Profile Meeting With Putin at G20 Summit - June 26th, 2017
- House Spending Bill Threatens to Suspend Nuclear Treaty With Russia - June 26th, 2017
- Bahrain Accuses Qatar of Seeking 'Military Escalation' - June 26th, 2017
- White House Appears to Be Planning Attack on Assad - June 26th, 2017
- Top Senator Blocks Gulf Arms Sales Over Qatar Crisis - June 26th, 2017