Who Made Flame Virus: Israel, US or None of the Above?
Nations Back Off Unofficial Claims of Credit
20 MB of massive computer virus, Flame continues to make its way around the Middle East, but where it came from is still very much a mystery. Initial Israeli hints at responsibility, centering on comments by Vice Premier Moshe Ya’alon, have since been retracted, claiming they were “out of context,” and similar claims of US responsibility have since been denied as well.
The virus first hit last month in Iran, targeting the nation’s oil industry with an arsenal of surveillance tools, taking screenshots, recording keystrokes, even turning on the computers’ microphones to record conversations.
Security experts term it a leap forward in complexity and sophistication of computer viruses, and despite its massive size it seems to be spreading at an alarming rate. Perhaps the scariest part is that with over 650,000 lines of code, those experts still aren’t entirely sure what all it can do.
Even the virus’ design is something of a mystery. It is written at least in part in the Lua scripting language, a relatively unusual language whose primary claim to fame is in video game scripting. This spawned speculation that some unknown cult of video game players had created the virus for some unknown reason, though of course Lua has broader applications than just video games and its similarity to Scheme potentially makes it a very powerful language.
The consequences of the Flame Virus continue to be debated worldwide, as past government-created cyberweapons like the Stuxnet Worm have been co-opted by other hacking groups for their own purposes. Calls to give the United Nations full regulatory control over the Internet, bolstered by Russian officials, are expected to gain further steam with the virus.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Judge: Bradley Manning Trial Will Include 'Classified' Portions - May 21st, 2013
- Afghan Officials: Body of US Torture Video Victim Found Near Base - May 21st, 2013
- State Dept Official Says Iranian Troops of Fighting in Syria - May 21st, 2013
- Austria: If EU Arms Syrian Rebels, We'll Withdraw From UN Mission - May 21st, 2013
- UN Mediator: Syrian Govt, Rebels Preparing for Peace Talks - May 21st, 2013





paulBass
May 31st, 2012 at 8:31 pm
some states are attacked for the weaponizing of things that don't exist
while others are praised for the weaponizing of everything that exist
Nathan
May 31st, 2012 at 10:42 pm
I doubt if any righteous country would want to get credit for a despicable act, unless they are contemptible themselves.
This is an act of war and the victim must retaliate by any act and any means without restriction. That is probably why the terrorist culprits already backed off.
Dave
May 31st, 2012 at 11:40 pm
So you take at face value denials by known serial liars?of course, they're going to deny it. Cyber terrorism is a crime.
Roger Lafontaine
June 1st, 2012 at 3:01 am
The target is Iran isn't it?
jinx77
June 1st, 2012 at 3:02 am
if this targeted the US …there would be a worldwide manhunt …for the culprit….
seeing it is targeting Iran …..
then no problem….
the sick west governments of today ….well there are very ill …and will eventually fail..
El Tonno
June 1st, 2012 at 4:36 am
Well, Lua is what you want if you have to quickly modify your program to account for changing requirements. It can work as "glue" to call other modules and also as "liquid heart" to change key logic quickly. Which is why it's used in games and other programs (like PowerDNS) that need tuning by users and developers. Good choice.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2100902/is-lua…
The fact that 20 MiB of executable can transit freely is testament to the delapidory state of computer security today. That's bigger than the harddisk on my first PC.
http://www.securelist.com/en/blog?weblogid=208193… http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/31/flame_hyp…
curmudgeonvt
June 1st, 2012 at 6:44 am
Yup…that's why Symantec (Norton) issued a notice to subscribers that they had the latest antidote for the Flame virus…here in the good ole USofA. Unintended Consequences…again. They'll probably use any instance of Flame being found in the US to claim the right to clamp down on the Intertubes…for our own safety, of course.
Hanussen
June 1st, 2012 at 7:14 am
1977: "Well, when the President does it, that means that it is not illegal."
2012: When Bibi orders the President to do it, that means that it is not illegal.
guest
June 1st, 2012 at 10:30 am
Thesis, anti-thesis & synthesis. Welcome to your Hegelian task masters thinking process. They create the "problem" and then call for "action" leading to fulfillment of their "plan". All while the slaves pay for it and fantasize that they are somehow free. Amazing!
mark
June 1st, 2012 at 1:03 pm
Cyber-terrorism is a crime. Significantly, neither Israeli or American computers seem to be affected by this latest terror weapon. What shall we conclude?
Johnny_Warbucks
June 1st, 2012 at 2:33 pm
Well, this article asks a question that is answered by the one directly on top of it. It's quite clear that the Axis of Evil – terrorists 1 and 2 – are the culprits. Not that there were any doubts. Everything the US and Isreal put out will come back to them twofold.