Speaking on Fox News Sunday, former Governor and presidential hopeful Mitt Romney slammed President Obama’s current policy in the Afghan War, claiming that his use of a “specific timetable” on the war proved his “failed leadership.”
Romney’s attempts to position himself as somewhat more hawkish than Obama on Afghanistan, though a common go-to tactic for campaigns, seems to be running afoul of Congressional Republicans, many of whom are shifting away from John McCain style super-hawk positions to a more vague Obama-style hawkishness, even endorsing the president’s Afghan strategy.
The shift reflects overwhelming American opposition to the war, and while politicians by and large don’t seem comfortable opposing the war, Romney’s effort to make the war a campaign issue is a major gamble.
Romney’s closest rival in the GOP race, Rick Santorum, is staking out a somewhat less hawkish position, criticizing Obama but saying that the policy should be “commit to winning or let’s get out.” Of the other remaining candidates Newt Gingrich, usually a hawk on such matters, has termed the Afghan War unwinnable and Rep. Ron Paul has opposed it from the start.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Latest US Navy Collision Fuels Speculation About 'Hacking' - August 22nd, 2017
- US, North Korea Clash at UN Forum Over Nuclear Arms - August 22nd, 2017
- NATO Chief Declares Alliance 'Fully Committed' to US War in Afghan - August 22nd, 2017
- Haley Demands IAEA Launch New Inspections of Iran Military Sites - August 22nd, 2017
- No End in Sight for US War in Afghanistan - August 22nd, 2017