Elements of al-Qaeda’s affiliates in Iraq have been moving into Syria to distribute weapons to the opposition and to carry out attacks against the regime of Bashar al-Assad, according to U.S. and Iraqi officials.
These terrorists, often described as al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) carried out two recent bombings in the Syrian capital, Damascus, and likely was behind the suicide bombings on Friday in the city of Aleppo that killed at least 28 people, anonymous U.S. officials told McClatchy Newspapers.
Iraq’s Deputy Interior Minister Adnan al-Assadi said in an interview with the press on Saturday that AQI has snuck across the border to aid the Syrian opposition forces with arms. “We have intelligence information that a number of Iraqi jihadists went to Syria,” he said, adding that “weapons smuggling is still ongoing” from Iraq into Syria.
“The weapons are being smuggled from Mosul through the Rabia crossing to Syria, as members of the same families live on both sides of the border,” Assadi said.
There is not yet substantial independent confirmation or evidence of these claims made by U.S. and Iraqi officials, but if it’s true it may pose a number of problems. First, the claims appear to verify Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s allegations that al-Qaeda terrorists have been involved with the uprising against his regime and go against claims by the Syrian opposition which held that Assad’s regime had staged the bombings to discredit those calling that have protested this past year.
This would harm claims by some influential figures in Washington that the U.S. ought to support the armed groups like the Free Syrian Army fighting the Assad regime. If they’re allied with al-Qaeda, it would be a difficult political sell (although the NATO-backed rebels in Libya also had similar ties).
On the other hand, there could be an attempt by Washington to use al-Qaeda’s alleged presence in Syria as a justification for a full-scale military intervention. The case could easily be made that al-Qaeda fighters and their comrades in the opposition are manifestly separate from the protest movement and that al-Qaeda’s presence in Syria is grounds for intervention under the incredibly broad mandate of the “global war on terrorism.”
The Pentagon and U.S. Central Command are currently reviewing possible U.S. military options against the Syrian regime and the specter of a proxy war of world powers in Syria has been raised as of late. But there is no indication yet of which posture the U.S. is taking in light of this supposed intelligence of jihadists in Syria.
It makes sense that Sunni AL Qadea would want and welcome the overthrow of Shiite Assad. Of course AQI proliferated and thrived in a post-Saddam Iraq and was never actually defeated by the US, despite the propganda surrounding the failed troop surge. This just adds to the legacy and list of failed American policies in the Middle East.
"Makes sense" huh? "Of course"? "Failed policies"? What policies are those anyway?
There isn't one reason to believe a single solitary word in the above article.
Thanks for your kind response. As for "making sense", AQI (that's Al Qaeda in Iraq) does have a reputation for bombing and killing lots of Shiites (as opposed to Sunnis) in Iraq (that's the country next to Syria). I am not aware of a sinlge Shiite member of al Qaeda, and I know that al Qaeda has unfriendly things to say about Shiites. So it isn't out of the realm of possibilty to suggest that AQI has slipped across the border and has started a bombing camapign against Assad's Shiite (a opposed to Suni) regime.
As for failed policies I was referring to the Iraq War that was in part supposed to make Iraq a safe haven from terrorism, but instead created the conditions for AQI to come into existence. When the inacted policy result in an outcome exactly opposite of what you intended it would usually be termed a failed policy.
There is no reason to believe "AQI" even exists or ever existed. I'm not aware of ANY members of this "AQI". Safe haven from terrosism? That was the policy? Are you kidding me? Are you kidding yourself? AQI? Good lord.
Do you actually think the stuff we see as the reasons and the who's and the what's and even the where's in our media have anything to do with the reality on the ground? That the aims of policies are what the New York Times says they are?
Do you understand – yet- that everything in our media – is a lie? You are oblivious.
Strange – antiwar.com posts this as fact, but any other news about what's happening to the people of Syria uses quotes in the title, is skeptical (if not mocking) of their reports, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if supporters were sneaking arms in to help people defend themselves, but I'm surprised you so easily accept the 'They're just Al-Qaeda anyway, so who cares if they're killed/tortured' argument that's been used so successfully elsewhere.
Who is Al Quaeda must be the question, what they do or have done and doing is relevant to US, Israel and EU interests in Syria, Libya, Iraq and Iran which must be interesting. Al Quaeda was funded by Bush Sr. Afghanistan was given to them as a religious sanctuary and their leader is killed by US special forces last year, so why they always operating where US and EU wants to have a regime change, why these elements can not be silenced as their leader is. One thing for sure, they are operating and US, Israel and EU knows about it, now if they are still feed by US, Israel and EU although is not a 180% proven fact, but as long as they operate where they are needed to change a regime for US, Israel and EU then it is a proven fact that they are just there helping out.
"AQI" = "CIA"
Don't be fooled. All of these Al-Qaeda off-shoots with these goofy names are CIA fronts. My personal favorite is "AQAP" – Now, it took some REAL imagination to come up with that one!
Method: confess what no longer can remain hidden.
So when will they admit that USA is behind and with AL Qaida ? As in any country in the middle east..
Ex-CIA officer: Braindead West wants Jihadists to rule Libya:
French defense expert
At 3:50: USA they "have a secret agreement with the Jihadists: YOU GET THE SHARIA AND WE GET THE OIL"
globalresearch.ca reporter from Libya
13:20 NTC people: it was the USA who brought in Al Qaida. Libyans do not want the islamists, but the US wants them and is controlling them.
or is it to cover the Libyan Al CIAda involvement in Libya? A few days ago the Al CIAda commander of Tripoli, Lybia has been sent to Syria, in order to command the terrorist "SYRIAN FREE ARMY":
Al Qaida is used the same way motorcycle club is to mean hells angles by those who don't know anything about them.
a million refugees in a country of 20 million is bound to have an effect on the political situation.
and since we have finished protecting iraqis from foreign fighters coming from syria its only right that we protect syrians from foreign fighters from iraq…
I honestly don't know what to believe and not to believe. The situation is getting more confusing by the day. I reserve my opinion to a later day when things settle down a bit and we have a clearer picture of what has happened. It's impossible to draw conclusions at this stage. The public is being bomabrded by propaganda from both sides. Who shoud we believe ?
Believe this, it started as peaceful demonstration, the army and
Security forces started killing civilians, some of the army men
Defected for they were shot to death for refusing to shoot at
Civilians now those defectors called FSA by some and called
Terrorist by the Syrian government and now let's not believe
All this, there are civilians getting killed by the army and
Security forces and also by thugs employed by the government
And that's the truth and from a reliable source what we all see
On TV is less than half what's going on, there is one sided
War going on in Syria and it's led by the government who
Swore not to give up till death do us apart.
"And that's the truth and from a reliable source "
What have you been smokin?
Syria is naturally fractious. Arab, tribal,and with an authoritarian govt set up many years back by a coup. At the time the world accepted that as legitimate because it suited them and, in truth, because it's entirely in character with the rest of the world govts, which are hardly any more "legitimate", silly-ass claims of democracy notwithstanding (the ruling elite buying politicians by buying elections by bribing the corruptible or hoodwinking the weak-minded). Get over it.
So here's the truth: The fall of the Soviet Union emboldened the neocons (militant Zionists all) to push the US into conquering the Mideast, for neocon political ascendancy, for Republican dreams of one party rule (the Republican version of the Thousand-Year Reich), for Pentagon glory(and perks, don't forget the perks), for MIC profits, for oil, for the Bankers, but mostly,…mostly,… for Israel (the neocons are right-wing Likudniks. All Israel all the time.).
So the always simmering, long suppressed political opposition in Syria gets some covert funding from the CIA and some provocative encouragement and training from the ever-present Mossad (probably posing as CIA),…and Voila! Righteous Rebellion. "Peaceful protesters" flooding the streets, clamoring for their democratic rights. The Syrian govt does as expected — not to mention, as justified — by a revolt fueled by foreign subversion, and then we hear the shrieking "massacre!! massacre!!" "Save us. Save us please. Give us a no fly zone, please, we're being killed by the gazillions!!!"
Sound familiar? US and Israeli opportunism, and along script lines crassly familiar.
Did al-Qaeda not have its genesis in the madrassas of Pakistan under the guidance of Osama bin Laden? And was it not financed, armed and trained with help from the USA? Did it not play an important part in subverting the Soviet Union way back in the Eighties? Is al-Qaeda not an offshoot of Saudi Arabian Wahabism? Is Saudi Arabia not a close ally of the USA? Is the USA an innocent bystander in the sectarian strife between Sunni (Wahabist) and Shia Muslims? Is this not all part of the Plan for world domination?
"Elements of al-Qaeda’s affiliates in Iraq have been moving into Syria to distribute weapons to the opposition and to carry out attacks against the regime of Bashar al-Assad, according to U.S. and Iraqi officials."
Here I call foul, for a more blatant piece of disinformation never existed. The idea that "elements" of the supposedly "decimated" Iraqi Sunni Islamists are somehow distributing weapons numerous enough and powerful enough to require the use of Syrian artillery and tanks to counter is not only unbelievable, but indeed could only have have been promulgated by an entity – to with, the Zionist FedGov – known for its unlimited contempt for the intelligence of its citizenry. No, the Syrian Islamists, who do indeed form the core of the rebels, have been receiving Iraqi weapons from US controlled stockpiles of the Saddam Hussein era.
its very clear the usa and europe want Irans oil and gas also to finish what hitler could not in Russia. but first needs to take out smaller countries blocking a clear path. any lies will do and any terriost actions are fine by the usa. over a million died in Iraq with the santions. russia is being surrounded by usa missiles. notice how all the feudel despots are still being armed to the teeth.
Regime change express is already at work inside Russia, and they have nukes. Once Syria and Iran go we'll see how long Israel can hold off the UN. Could turn out to be quite a blow to Israel and them as a sovereign country.
LOL — this is funny. Next time sunspots disrupt communications, Iraqi Al-Qaida will get blamed for that too. As long as it helps to keep money flowing from our pockets to the war machine that is.
this is all being done as an effort to stop the Syrian Army
from being able to cross into Israel.
Recently, the US government announced that al Qaeda was a broken and defeated force. Now the
tune has changed and al Qaeda is behind the Syrian revolt. I guess this gets the US and Israel off the hook.
Why wouldn't al-Qaida want to be behind the revolt in Syria; They hate the baath party?
You wouldn’t be afraid of the truth would you? What a bunch of p-ssies! Antiwar, you should be ashamed of yourselves.